Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32527045›Full record

ArticleCells2020

Sex Chromosomes and Sex Phenotype Contribute to Biased DNA Methylation in Mouse Liver.

Qinwei Kim-Wee Zhuang, Jose Hector Galvez, Qian Xiao, Najla AlOgayil, Jeffrey Hyacinthe, Teruko Taketo, Guillaume Bourque, Anna K Naumova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic variation in the Y chromosome and sex-biased DNA methylation in somatic cells in the mouse.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Qinwei Kim-Wee ZhuangDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 1C7, Canada.
Jose Hector GalvezCanadian Centre for Computational Genomics, Montréal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada.
Qian XiaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Najla AlOgayilDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 1C7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5456-099X
Jeffrey HyacintheDepartment of Quantitative Life Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.
Teruko TaketoThe Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
Guillaume BourqueDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 1C7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3933-9656
Anna K NaumovaDepartment of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 1C7, Canada.
McGill University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAOntario Genomics · CAHarvard University · US

Funding

CIHR MOP-115090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex biases in the genome-wide distribution of DNA methylation and gene expression levels are some of the manifestations of sexual dimorphism in mammals. To advance our understanding of the mechanisms that contribute to sex biases in DNA methylation and gene expression, we conducted whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) as well as RNA-seq on liver samples from mice with different combinations of sex phenotype and sex-chromosome complement. We compared groups of animals with different sex phenotypes, but the same genetic sexes, and vice versa, same sex phenotypes, but different sex-chromosome complements. We also compared sex-biased DNA methylation in mouse and human livers. Our data show that sex phenotype, X-chromosome dosage, and the presence of Y chromosome shape the differences in DNA methylation between males and females. We also demonstrate that sex bias in autosomal methylation is associated with sex bias in gene expression, whereas X-chromosome dosage-dependent methylation differences are not, as expected for a dosage-compensation mechanism. Furthermore, we find partial conservation between the repertoires of mouse and human genes that are associated with sex-biased methylation, an indication that gene function is likely to be an important factor in this phenomenon.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA MethylationFemaleGene ExpressionHumansLiverMalePhenotypeSex ChromosomesDNA methylationgene expressionmouse liversex-chromosome complementsexual dimorphismwhole genome bisulfite sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32527045
PMCPMC7349295
OpenAlexW3034555975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.