Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32526934›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

The Cellular and Molecular Determinants of Naphthoquinone-Dependent Activation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor.

Samantha C Faber, Sara Giani Tagliabue, Laura Bonati, Michael S Denison

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samantha C FaberDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Sara Giani TagliabueDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2393-2527
Laura BonatiDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3028-0368
Michael S DenisonDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

Workshop on Environmental Technology Transfer and EntrepreneurshipP42ES004699 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI YOUNG, THOMAS MICHAEL · 1987 to 2021
$50.1M
RECOMBINANT DETECTION SYSTEMS FOR DIOXIN LIKE CHEMICALSR01ES007685 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI DENISON, MICHAEL STEVEN · 1995 to 2019
$4.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004699NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES07685, P42ES004699, T32ES007059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1,2-naphthoquinone (1,2-NQ) and 1,4-naphthoquinone (1,4-NQ) are clinically promising biologically active chemicals that have been shown to stimulate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signaling pathway, but whether they are direct or indirect ligands or activate the AhR in a ligand-independent manner is unknown. Given the structural diversity of AhR ligands, multiple mechanisms of AhR activation of gene expression, and species differences in AhR ligand binding and response, we examined the ability of 1,2-NQ and 1,4-NQ to bind to and activate the mouse and human AhRs using a series of in vitro AhR-specific bioassays and in silico modeling techniques. Both NQs induced AhR-dependent gene expression in mouse and human hepatoma cells, but were more potent and efficacious in human cells. 1,2-NQ and 1,4-NQ stimulated AhR transformation and DNA binding in vitro and was inhibited by AhR antagonists. Ligand binding analysis confirmed the ability of 1,2-NQ and 1,4-NQ to competitively bind to the AhR ligand binding cavity and the molecular determinants for interactions were predicted by molecular modeling methods. NQs were shown to bind distinctly differently from that of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-

Indexed as

AnimalsAryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Nuclear TranslocatorBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsBinding, CompetitiveBinding SitesCell LineChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsCytochrome P-450 CYP1A1DNAGene Expression RegulationHumansMiceModels, MolecularMolecular Docking SimulationMutation1,2-naphthoquinone1,4-naphthoquinoneAHR protein, humanAhr protein, mouseARNT protein, humanAryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Nuclear TranslocatorBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCYP1A1 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP1A1DNANaphthoquinonesPolychlorinated DibenzodioxinsReceptors, Aryl Hydrocarbonaryl hydrocarbon receptordocking analysisligand bindingnaphthoquinones

Identifiers

PMID32526934
PMCPMC7312509
OpenAlexW3035742975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.