Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32526851›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2020

QSRR Automator: A Tool for Automating Retention Time Prediction in Lipidomics and Metabolomics.

Bradley C Naylor, J Leon Catrow, J Alan Maschek, James E Cox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. New software tools, databases, and resources in metabolomics: updates from 2020.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bradley C NaylorMetabolomics, Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry Cores, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
J Leon CatrowMetabolomics, Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry Cores, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
J Alan MaschekMetabolomics, Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry Cores, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
James E CoxMetabolomics, Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry Cores, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

Funding

Proteomics CoreU54DK110858 · NIDDK · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Anna E Beaudin, JAMES Eric COX · 2016 to 2026
$8.6M
Agilent 6550 QTOF system for U of UtahS10OD016232 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI COX, JAMES ERIC · 2013 to 2013
$578k
Q-ToF Mass Spectrometer for the University of Utah MS and Proteomics CoreS10OD018210 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI COX, JAMES ERIC · 2015 to 2015
$530k
Agilent 7200 GC/Q-TOF for the University of UtahS10OD021505 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI COX, JAMES ERIC · 2016 to 2016
$401k
NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK110858NIH HHS S10 OD016232NIH HHS S10 OD018210NIH HHS S10 OD021505NIH HHS U54 DK110858ODCDC CDC HHS S10 OD018210ODCDC CDC HHS S10 OD021505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of retention time is often critical for the identification of compounds in metabolomic and lipidomic studies. Standards are frequently unavailable for the retention time measurement of many metabolites, thus the ability to predict retention time for these compounds is highly valuable. A number of studies have applied machine learning to predict retention times, but applying a published machine learning model to different lab conditions is difficult. This is due to variation between chromatographic equipment, methods, and columns used for analysis. Recreating a machine learning model is likewise difficult without a dedicated bioinformatician. Herein we present QSRR Automator, a software package to automate retention time prediction model creation and demonstrate its utility by testing data from multiple chromatography columns from previous publications and in-house work. Analysis of these data sets shows similar accuracy to published models, demonstrating the software's utility in metabolomic and lipidomic studies.

Indexed as

automationlipidomicsmachine learningmetabolomicsretention time prediction

Identifiers

PMID32526851
PMCPMC7345697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.