Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32526836›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Molecular Detection of

Mirosław M Michalski, Katarzyna Kubiak, Magdalena Szczotko, Marta Chajęcka, Małgorzata Dmitryjuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review of Molecular Tools Used in Diagnosis ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Co-Occurrence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Prevalence ofJournal of veterinary research · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The First Records of Canine Babesiosis in Dogs fromPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Abundance ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mirosław M MichalskiDepartment of Parasitology and Invasive Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 13, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8515-3054
Katarzyna KubiakDepartment of Medical Biology, Collegium Medicum, School of Public Health, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Zolnierska 14c, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6400-8958
Magdalena SzczotkoDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 1A, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8231-4182
Marta ChajęckaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 1A, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.
Małgorzata DmitryjukDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 1A, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9986-3847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From 2016 to 2018, ticks were collected from 272 dogs admitted to veterinary clinics in the city of Olsztyn (north-eastern Poland). Among 522 collected ticks, 423 were identified as

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumBorrelia burgdorferi sensu latoDermacentor reticulatusdogsIxodes ricinusticksurban areas

Identifiers

PMID32526836
PMCPMC7350305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.