Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32526460›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical epidemiology2020

A large number of COVID-19 interventional clinical trials were registered soon after the pandemic onset: a descriptive analysis.

Ali A Nasrallah, Sarah H Farran, Zainab A Nasrallah, Mohamad A Chahrour, Hamza A Salhab, Mohamad Y Fares, Hussein H Khachfe, Elie A Akl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ali A NasrallahFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Sarah H FarranFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Zainab A NasrallahFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mohamad A ChahrourFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hamza A SalhabFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Neuroscience Research Center, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mohamad Y FaresFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Neuroscience Research Center, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon; College of Medical, Veterinary, and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Hussein H KhachfeFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Neuroscience Research Center, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Elie A AklDepartment of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. Electronic address: ea32@aub.edu.lb.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThere is a pressing need for evidence-based interventions to address the devastating clinical and public health effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The number of registered trials related to COVID-19 is increasing by the day. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of the currently registered interventional clinical trials related to COVID-19.

methodsWe searched the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform on May 15th, 2020. We included any entry that is related to COVID-19. We abstracted and then descriptively analyzed the following characteristics of the registered trials: study design, status, phase, primary endpoints, experimental interventions, and geographic location among other qualifiers.

resultsWe identified 1,308 eligible registered trials. Most trials were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (n = 703; 53.7%) and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (n = 291; 22.2%). The number of participants to be enrolled across these trials was 734,657, with a median of 110 participants per trial. The most commonly studied intervention category was pharmacologic (n = 763; 58.3%), with antiparasitic medications being the most common subcategory. Although over half of the trials were already recruiting, we identified published peer-reviewed results for only 8 of those trials.

conclusionThere is a relatively large number of registered trials but with very few results published so far. Although our findings suggest an appropriate initial response by the research community, the real challenge will be to get these trials completed, published, and translated into practice and policy.

Indexed as

PandemicsClinical Trials as TopicCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansPneumonia, ViralRegistriesClinical trialsCOVID-19Novel coronavirus diseaseTrial characteristicsTrial registration

Identifiers

PMID32526460
PMCPMC7278640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.