ArticlePhysiology & behavior2020
Altering salivary protein profile can decrease aversive oromotor responding to quinine in rats.
Article in Physiology & behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional bitter taste signaling and stimulus intensity influence diet-induced salivary protein upregulation.Appetite · 2026Article
- Article
- Salivary proteins rescue within-session suppression and conditioned avoidance in response to an intragastric quinine infusion.Physiology & behavior · 2024Article
- The role of saliva in taste and food intake.Physiology & behavior · 2023Review
- Salivary flow and turbidity development inconsistently associated with lower taste intensity of vegetables and juices.Food quality and preference · 2023Article
- Novel impacts of saliva with regard to oral health.The Journal of prosthetic dentistry · 2022Review
- Infant and Toddler Responses to Bitter-Tasting Novel Vegetables: Findings from the Good Tastes Study.The Journal of nutrition · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bitter taste is often associated with toxins, but accepting some bitter foods, such as green vegetables, can be an important part of maintaining a healthy diet. It has previously been shown that animals exposed to quinine upregulate a set of salivary proteins (SPs), and those with upregulated SPs have increased rates of feeding on a quinine diet as well as increased brief-access licking to and higher detection thresholds for quinine. These studies suggest that SPs alter orosensory feedback; however, they rely on SPs upregulated by diet exposure and cannot control for the role of learning. Here, we use taste reactivity to determine if SPs can alter bitter taste in animals with no previous bitter diet experience. First, saliva with proteins stimulated by injections of isoproterenol and pilocarpine was collected from anesthetized rats; this "donor saliva" was analyzed for protein concentration and profile. Bitter-naïve rats were implanted with oral catheters and infused with taste stimuli dissolved in saliva that contained all of the SPs from the donors, saliva that was filtered of SPs, water, or artificial saliva. Their orofacial movements were recorded and quantified. We found that presence of quinine increased movements associated with aversive stimuli, but adding SPs to the infusion was sufficient to reduce aversive oromotor responding to quinine. The effect was dependent on the total protein concentration of the saliva, as protein concentration increased aversive responses decreased. Additionally, infusions of whole saliva altered aversive responding to quinine, but not other stimuli (citric acid, NaCl, sucrose). Our work suggests that effect of these SPs is specific and the presence of SPs is sufficient to decrease aversive orosensory feedback to bitter stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.