Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32525952›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Survival of Escherichia coli O157 in autoclaved and natural sandy soil mesocosms.

Christopher A Baker, Shinyoung Lee, Jaysankar De, Kwangcheol C Jeong, Keith R Schneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sporadic Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Role of soil in the regulation of human and plant pathogens: soils' contributions to people.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher A BakerDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Shinyoung LeeDepartment of Animal Sciences, Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Jaysankar DeDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9799-9401
Kwangcheol C JeongDepartment of Animal Sciences, Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Keith R SchneiderDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0145-3418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the soil microbiome may influence pathogen survival, determining the major contributors that reduce pathogen survival is inconclusive. This research was performed to determine the survival of E. coli O157 in autoclaved and natural (unautoclaved) sandy soils. Soils were inoculated with three different E. coli O157 strains (stx1+/stx2+, stx1-/stx2-, and stx1-/stx2+), and enumerated until extinction at 30°C. There was a significant difference in the survival of E. coli O157 based on soil treatment (autoclaved versus natural) at 30°C on days 1 (P = 0.00022), 3, (P = 2.53e-14), 7 (P = 5.59e-16), 14 (P = 1.072e-12), 30 (P = 7.18e-9), and 56 (P = 0.00029), with greater survival in autoclaved soils. The time to extinction (two consecutive negative enrichments) for all three strains was 169 and 84 days for autoclaved and natural soils, respectively. A separate E. coli O157 trial supplemented with 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the soil microbiome was performed at 15°C and 30°C on days 0, 7, 14, and 28 for each soil treatment. Greater species richness (Chao1, P = 2.2e-16) and diversity (Shannon, P = 2.2e-16) was observed in natural soils in comparison with autoclaved soils. Weighted UniFrac (beta-diversity) showed a clear distinction between soil treatments (P = 0.001). The greatest reduction of E. coli O157 was observed in natural soils at 30°C, and several bacterial taxa positively correlated (relative abundance) with time (day 0 to 28) in these soils (P < 0.05), suggesting that the presence of those bacteria might cause the reduction of E. coli O157. Taken together, a clear distinction in E. coli O157 survival, was observed between autoclaved and natural soils along with corresponding differences in microbial diversity in soil treatments. This research provides further insights into the bacterial taxa that may influence E. coli O157 in soils.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyCell SurvivalEscherichia coli O157Hot TemperatureMicrobiotaPressureSteamSterilizationSteam

Identifiers

PMID32525952
PMCPMC7289397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.