Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32525492›Full record

Observational studyJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Digital Phenotyping Self-Monitoring Behaviors for Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Observational Study Using Latent Class Growth Analysis.

Qing Yang, Daniel Hatch, Matthew J Crowley, Allison A Lewinski, Jacqueline Vaughn, Dori Steinberg, Allison Vorderstrasse, Meilin Jiang, Ryan J Shaw

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04587336 (Tailored Approaches to Reduce Distress and Improve Self-Management for Veterans With Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04587336 completednot on this map

Tailored Approaches to Reduce Distress and Improve Self-Management for Veterans With Diabetes (TARDIS) - Survey & Qualitative Interview

TypeobservationalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2020 to 2025Enrolled225ConditionsDiabetes, Diabetes Distress, Self-Management, VeteranArmsCognitive Interview, Baseline Survey, Qualitative Interviews
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Diabetes Technology Meeting 2023.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. BMC digital health · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qing YangSchool of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4844-4690
Daniel HatchSchool of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0220-7059
Matthew J CrowleyCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6205-4536
Allison A LewinskiCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1356-1857
Jacqueline VaughnSchool of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0131-4330
Dori SteinbergSchool of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7588-4216
Allison VorderstrasseCollege of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8770-1851
Meilin JiangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4515-4567
Ryan J ShawSchool of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6800-6503

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's HealthK12HD043446 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI AMUNDSEN, CINDY · 2002 to 2023
$9.6M
From Episodic to Real-Time Care in Diabetes Self-ManagementR15NR015890 · NINR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SHAW, RYAN JEFFREY · 2016 to 2016
$477k
Technology-Mediated Symptom Management in Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant CareF31NR018100 · NINR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI VAUGHN, JACQUELINE · 2018 to 2019
$79k
HSRD VA CIN 13-410NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD043446NINR NIH HHS F31 NR018100NINR NIH HHS R15 NR015890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSustained self-monitoring and self-management behaviors are crucial to maintain optimal health for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). As smartphones and mobile health (mHealth) devices become widely available, self-monitoring using mHealth devices is an appealing strategy in support of successful self-management of T2DM. However, research indicates that engagement with mHealth devices decreases over time. Thus, it is important to understand engagement trajectories to provide varying levels of support that can improve self-monitoring and self-management behaviors.

objectiveThe aims of this study were to develop (1) digital phenotypes of the self-monitoring behaviors of patients with T2DM based on their engagement trajectory of using multiple mHealth devices, and (2) assess the association of individual digital phenotypes of self-monitoring behaviors with baseline demographic and clinical characteristics.

methodsThis longitudinal observational feasibility study included 60 participants with T2DM who were instructed to monitor their weight, blood glucose, and physical activity using a wireless weight scale, phone-tethered glucometer, and accelerometer, respectively, over 6 months. We used latent class growth analysis (LCGA) with multitrajectory modeling to associate the digital phenotypes of participants' self-monitoring behaviors based on their engagement trajectories with multiple mHealth devices. Associations between individual characteristics and digital phenotypes on participants' self-monitoring behavior were assessed by analysis of variance or the Chi square test.

resultsThe engagement with accelerometers to monitor daily physical activities was consistently high for all participants over time. Three distinct digital phenotypes were identified based on participants' engagement with the wireless weight scale and glucometer: (1) low and waning engagement group (24/60, 40%), (2) medium engagement group (20/60, 33%), and (3) consistently high engagement group (16/60, 27%). Participants that were younger, female, nonwhite, had a low income, and with a higher baseline hemoglobin A

conclusionsWe demonstrated how to digitally phenotype individuals' self-monitoring behavior based on their engagement trajectory with multiple mHealth devices. Distinct self-monitoring behavior groups were identified. Individual demographic and clinical characteristics were associated with different self-monitoring behavior groups. Future research should identify methods to provide tailored support for people with T2DM to help them better monitor and manage their condition. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/13517.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2TelemedicineBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringExerciseFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedGlycated Hemoglobindigital phenotypelatent class growth analysisMobile Healthself-managementself-monitoringtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32525492
PMCPMC7317630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.