Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32525477›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of urology2020

Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): Techniques and outcomes.

Panagiotis Kallidonis, Arman Tsaturyan, Marco Lattarulo, Evangelos Liatsikos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Effects of severe hydronephrosis on surgical outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL).Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Panagiotis KallidonisDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6854-4501
Arman TsaturyanDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2499-7015
Marco LattaruloDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3574-9228
Evangelos LiatsikosDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5544-9636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was introduced to decrease the morbidity of the standard PCNL (sPCNL). Thereafter, many modifications and techniques have been presented with the introduction of different miniaturized PCNL (mPCNL) techniques, such as micro-PCNL and ultra-mini-PCNL (UMP). As of present, none of the techniques has displaced the sPCNL. Nonetheless, mini-PCNL has continuously widening indications and has been proposed to have significant advantages over sPCNL. In the current review, each technique is presented while discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. A comprehensive review of the current literature has been performed. Articles related to the topic were retrieved and critically analyzed. Less peri-operative bleeding and shorter hospital stay were the most important advantages advocated for mini-PCNL. Although the performance of mini-PCNL is safe, the utilization of micro-PCNL and UMP should be done with caution.

Identifiers

PMID32525477
PMCPMC7731950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.