Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32525271›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2020

Nutritional evaluation and growth of infants in a Rwandan neonatal follow-up clinic.

Jessica Bradford, Kathryn Beck, Alphonse Nshimyiryo, Kim Wilson, Christine Mutaganzwa, Silas Havugarurema, Patient Ngamije, Alphonsine Uwamahoro, Catherine M Kirk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jessica BradfordFaculty of Global Health Delivery, University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.
Kathryn BeckFaculty of Global Health Delivery, University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0001-7407-9418
Alphonse NshimyiryoFaculty of Global Health Delivery, University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.
Kim WilsonBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Christine MutaganzwaFaculty of Global Health Delivery, University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.
Silas HavugaruremaKirehe District Hospital, Ministry of Health of Rwanda, Kirehe, Rwanda.
Patient NgamijeKirehe District Hospital, Ministry of Health of Rwanda, Kirehe, Rwanda.
Alphonsine UwamahoroKirehe District Hospital, Ministry of Health of Rwanda, Kirehe, Rwanda.
Catherine M KirkFaculty of Global Health Delivery, University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0001-9103-2611
University of Global Health Equity · RWKirwan Health Campus · AUBoston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children born preterm, low birth weight (LBW) or with other perinatal risk factors are at high-risk of malnutrition. Regular growth monitoring and early intervention are essential to promote optimal feeding and growth; however, monitoring growth in preterm infants can be complex. This study evaluated growth monitoring of infants under 6 months enrolled in Paediatric Development Clinics (PDCs) in rural Rwanda. We reviewed electronic medical records (EMR) of infants enrolled in PDCs before age 2 months with their first visit between January 2015 and December 2016 and followed them until age 6 months. Nurse classification of anthropometric measures and nutritional status were extracted from the EMR. Interval growth and length-for-age, weight-for-length, and weight-for-age z-scores were calculated using World Health Organization anthropometry software as a 'gold standard' comparison to nurse classifications. Two hundred and ninety-four patients enrolled and had 2,033 visits during the study period. Referral reasons included prematurity/LBW (73.8%) and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (28.2%). Nurses assessed interval growth at 58.7% of visits, length-for-age at 66.4%, weight-for-length at 65.6% and weight-for-age at 66.4%. Nurses and gold standard assessment agreed on interval growth at 53.3% of visits and length-for-age at 63.7%, weight-for-length at 78.2% and weight-for-age at 66.3%. At 6 months, 46.5% were stunted, 19.9% were wasted and 44.2% were underweight. There were significant challenges to optimizing growth and growth monitoring among high-risk infants served by PDCs, including incomplete and inaccurate assessments. Developing tools for clinician decision support in assessing growth and providing specialized nutritional counselling are essential to supporting optimal outcomes in this population.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureMalnutritionAgedChildCounselingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedPregnancyRwandaearly growthgrowth monitoringmalnutritionpreterm infantsprimary health carequality of caresick and small newbornsundernutrition

Identifiers

PMID32525271
PMCPMC7507011
OpenAlexW3033296473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.