Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32525249›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2020

European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility recommendations for conducting gastrointestinal motility and function testing in the recovery phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Jan Tack, Tim Vanuytsel, Jordi Serra, Anna Accarino, Vincenzo Stanghellini, Giovanni Barbara, ESNM Consensus Group, the Leuven Consensus Group, the Italian Consensus Group, the Spanish Consensus Group on function testing in the COVID-19 pandemic era

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on high-resolution manometry and peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal motility disorder in Japan.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Statements for conducting high-resolution manometry during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Jan TackDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3206-6704
Tim VanuytselDepartment of Chronic Diseases, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Metabolism and Ageing (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8728-0903
Jordi SerraMotility and Functional Gut Disorders Unit, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2120-6270
Anna AccarinoCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de enfermedades hepaticas y digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, Spain.
Vincenzo StanghelliniDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Internal Medicine, University of Bologna, St Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0559-4875
Giovanni BarbaraDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Internal Medicine, University of Bologna, St Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9745-0726
ESNM Consensus Group, the Leuven Consensus Group, the Italian Consensus Group, the Spanish Consensus Group on function testing in the COVID-19 pandemic era
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas · ESIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITKU Leuven · BERome Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the peak of the COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, care for patients with gastrointestinal motility and functional disorders was largely suspended. In the recovery phases of the pandemic, non-urgent medical care is resumed, but there is a lack of guidance for restarting and safely conducting motility and function testing. Breath tests and insertion of manometry and pH-monitoring probes carry a risk of SARS-CoV-2 spread through droplet formation.

methodsA panel of experts from the European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) evaluated emerging national and single-center recommendations to provide the best current evidence and a pragmatic approach to ensure the safe conduct of motility and function testing for both healthcare professionals and patients.

resultsAt a general level, this involves evaluation of the urgency of the procedure, evaluation of the infectious risk associated with the patient, the investigation and the healthcare professional(s) involved, provision of the test planning and test units, education and training of staff, and use of personnel protection equipment. Additional guidance is provided for specific procedures such as esophageal manometry, pH monitoring, and breath tests. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: The ESNM guidelines provide pragmatic and appropriate guidance for the safe conduct of motility and function testing in the COVID-19 pandemic and early recovery phase.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19EuropeExpert TestimonyGastroenterologyGastrointestinal MotilityHealth PersonnelHumansNeurologyPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPractice Guidelines as TopicProtective ClothingRecovery of FunctionSARS-CoV-2breath testCOVID-19esophageal manometrypersonal protection equipmentpH monitoring

Identifiers

PMID32525249
PMCPMC7300574
OpenAlexW3033825202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.