Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32525205›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2020

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Orphans and Vulnerable Children Affected by HIV/AIDS Worldwide.

Tina Thomas, Mei Tan, Yusra Ahmed, Elena L Grigorenko

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Interventions currently implemented among orphans in South-Africa: a scoping review.SAHARA J : journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS Research Alliance · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Brain MRI and neurocognitive characteristics of children and adolescents living with HIV.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tina ThomasDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
Mei TanDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
Yusra AhmedTexas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
Elena L GrigorenkoDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
University of Houston · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

A Community-Based Evaluation of Interventions for Orphans and Vulnerable ChildrenR01HD085836 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GRIGORENKO, ELENA L · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD085836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide, there are more than 13.3 million orphans and vulnerable children affected by Human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) (HIV OVC), defined as individuals below the age of 18 who have lost one or both parents to HIV/AIDS or have been made vulnerable by HIV/AIDS; they are at risk for negative psychosocial and cognitive outcomes. PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to examine the scientific literature on available interventions for HIV OVC, with a focus on community-based interventions (CBI).

methodsSystematic electronic searches were conducted from four databases between October 2016 and April 2017 to identify articles investigating the effectiveness of interventions for HIV OVC. Effect sizes were calculated for each article which provided enough information and data points for analyses.

resultsSeventy-four articles were reviewed, including psychosocial interventions (d = 0.30), cognitive interventions (d = 0.14), social protection interventions (d = 0.36), and community-based interventions (CBI; d = 0.36). Study-specific effect sizes varied widely, ranging from -1.09 to 2.26, that is, from a negative effect to an impressively large positive one, but the majority of studies registered small to medium effects (the overall effect size for all studies was 0.32, SE = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.26-0.37). Social protection interventions had the highest positive outcomes whereas CBI tended to have the fewest significant positive outcomes, with some outcomes worsening instead of improving.

conclusionsOverall, interventions provided to OVC have potential for improving cognitive, psychosocial, and risk-behavior outcomes. Social protection interventions and CBI had the highest effect sizes, but CBI had positive effects on fewer outcomes and demonstrated some negative effects. CBI warrant scrutiny for improvement, as they represent an important form of culturally embedded services with potentially long-term benefits to OVC, yet appear to be differentially effective. Successful components of other types of intervention were identified, including cash grants, mentorship, and family therapy. In addition, more research is needed that attends to which interventions may be more effective for specific populations, or that studies cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyCommunity Health ServicesPsychosocial InterventionSocial SupportAcquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdolescentChildChild of Impaired ParentsChild, OrphanedChild, PreschoolCognitionHealth Risk BehaviorsHIV InfectionsHumansPublic PolicyVulnerable PopulationsHIV/AIDSInterventionOVCSystematic reviewYouth

Identifiers

PMID32525205
PMCPMC7646155
OpenAlexW3033314947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.