Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32524895›Full record

Trial reportGlobal health action2020

Adding video-debriefing to Helping-Babies-Breathe training enhanced retention of neonatal resuscitation knowledge and skills among health workers in Uganda: a cluster randomized trial.

Beatrice Odongkara, Thorkild Tylleskär, Nicola Pejovic, Vincentina Achora, David Mukunya, Grace Ndeezi, James K Tumwine, Victoria Nankabirwa

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Global health action, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05257499 (In-person Versus Online Debriefing in the Simulation Sessions of the Helping Babies Breathe Course), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05257499 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

In-person Versus Online Debriefing in the Simulation Sessions of the Helping Babies Breathe Course: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmerican University of Beirut Medical CenterRan2021 to 2022Enrolled49ConditionsNeonatal Respiratory DistressArmsOn line debriefing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Beatrice OdongkaraDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Gulu University Faculty of Medicine , Gulu, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-6283-9114
Thorkild TylleskärCenter for International Health, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4801-4324
Nicola PejovicCenter for International Health, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9963-7375
Vincentina AchoraDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Gulu University Faculty of Medicine , Gulu, Uganda.
David MukunyaCenter for International Health, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway.
Grace NdeeziCollege of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Makerere University , Kampala, Uganda.
James K TumwineCollege of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Makerere University , Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-3422-7460
Victoria NankabirwaCenter for International Health, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkilled birth attendants must be competent to provide prompt resuscitation to save newborn lives at birth. Both knowledge and skills (competence) decline with time after training but the optimal duration for refresher training among frontline-skilled birth attendants in low-resource settings is unknown.

objectivesWe assessed the effect of an innovative Helping-Babies-Breathe simulation-based teaching method using video-debriefing compared to standard Helping-Babies-Breathe training on 1) neonatal resuscitation knowledge and skills attainment and 2) competence retention among skilled birth attendants in Northern Uganda.

methodsA total of 26 health facilities with 86 birth attendants were equally randomised to intervention and control arms. The 2nd edition of the American Association of Pediatrics Helping-Babies-Breathe curriculum was used for training and assessment. Knowledge and skills were assessed pre- and post-training, and during follow-up at 6 months. A mixed effects linear regression model for repeated measures was used to assess the short and long-term effects of the intervention on neonatal resuscitation practices while accounting for clustering.

resultsEighty-two (95.3%) skilled birth attendants completed follow-up at 6 months. Approximately 80% of these had no prior Helping-Babies-Breathe training and 75% reported practicing neonatal resuscitation routinely. Standard Helping-Babies-Breathe training with video-debriefing improved knowledge and skills attainment post-training [adjusted mean difference: 5.34; 95% CI: 0.82-10.78] and retention [adjusted mean difference: 2.97; 95% CI: 1.52-4.41] over 6 months post-training compared to standard training after adjusting for confounding and clustering. Factors that reduced knowledge and skills retention among birth attendants were monthly resuscitation of one neonate or more and being in service for more than 5 years.

conclusionAdding video-debriefing to standard Helping-Babies-Breathe training had an effect on birth attendants' competence attainment and retention over 6 months in Uganda. However, more research is needed to justify the proposed intervention in this context.

Indexed as

CurriculumVideo RecordingAdultAsphyxia NeonatorumClinical CompetenceComputer-Assisted InstructionFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedResuscitationUgandaattainment and retentionHelping-Babies-Breatheknowledge and skillsstandard trainingVideo-debriefing

Identifiers

PMID32524895
PMCPMC7480409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.