Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32524780›Full record

ReviewKorean journal of radiology2020

Radiomics in Breast Imaging from Techniques to Clinical Applications: A Review.

Seung Hak Lee, Hyunjin Park, Eun Sook Ko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Korean journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multi-parametric MRI radiomics predicts different HER2 expression in breast cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Quantitative MR Imaging of the Breast.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seung Hak LeeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8618-7261
Hyunjin ParkCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5681-8918
Eun Sook KoDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. mathilda0330@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0399-7956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in computer technology have generated a new area of research known as radiomics. Radiomics is defined as the high throughput extraction and analysis of quantitative features from imaging data. Radiomic features provide information on the gray-scale patterns, inter-pixel relationships, as well as shape and spectral properties of radiological images. Moreover, these features can be used to develop computational models that may serve as a tool for personalized diagnosis and treatment guidance. Although radiomics is becoming popular and widely used in oncology, many problems such as overfitting and reproducibility issues remain unresolved. In this review, we will outline the steps of radiomics used for oncology, specifically addressing applications for breast cancer patients and focusing on technical issues.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyBreast cancerInformaticsQuantitative imagingRadiomicsTexture

Identifiers

PMID32524780
PMCPMC7289696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.