Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32524739›Full record

ArticleBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2020

Coevolution of body size and metabolic rate in vertebrates: a life-history perspective.

Jan Kozłowski, Marek Konarzewski, Marcin Czarnoleski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The "fire of life cycles": age-specific metabolic scaling within and among species.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mass scaling of standard metabolic rate within and among individuals in Western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis).Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Morphological Variation in the Striped Field Mouse Across Three Countries.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Estimating the relationship between fitness and metabolic rate: which rate should we use?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jan KozłowskiInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa, 7, 30-387, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7084-2030
Marek KonarzewskiInstitute of Biology, University of Białystok, Ciołkowskiego 1J, 15-245, Białystok, Poland.
Marcin CzarnoleskiInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa, 7, 30-387, Kraków, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PLUniversity of Białystok · PL

Funding

Jagiellonian University in Krakow DS/WB/INoS 757Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2015/17/B/NZ8/02484Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2016/21/B/NZ8/00303Polish National Science Centre Maestro grant 2011/02A/NZ8/00064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite many decades of research, the allometric scaling of metabolic rates (MRs) remains poorly understood. Here, we argue that scaling exponents of these allometries do not themselves mirror one universal law of nature but instead statistically approximate the non-linearity of the relationship between MR and body mass. This 'statistical' view must be replaced with the life-history perspective that 'allows' organisms to evolve myriad different life strategies with distinct physiological features. We posit that the hypoallometric allometry of MRs (mass scaling with an exponent smaller than 1) is an indirect outcome of the selective pressure of ecological mortality on allocation 'decisions' that divide resources among growth, reproduction, and the basic metabolic costs of repair and maintenance reflected in the standard or basal metabolic rate (SMR or BMR), which are customarily subjected to allometric analyses. Those 'decisions' form a wealth of life-history variation that can be defined based on the axis dictated by ecological mortality and the axis governed by the efficiency of energy use. We link this variation as well as hypoallometric scaling to the mechanistic determinants of MR, such as metabolically inert component proportions, internal organ relative size and activity, cell size and cell membrane composition, and muscle contributions to dramatic metabolic shifts between the resting and active states. The multitude of mechanisms determining MR leads us to conclude that the quest for a single-cause explanation of the mass scaling of MRs is futile. We argue that an explanation based on the theory of life-history evolution is the best way forward.

Indexed as

Basal MetabolismVertebratesAnimalsBody Sizeadaptationevolution of body sizeevolution of metabolic ratehypoallometric scalinglife historymass scaling of metabolismnegative allometryphysiology

Identifiers

PMID32524739
PMCPMC7540708
OpenAlexW3033061327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.