Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32524511›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020

A novel approach to medicines optimisation post-discharge from hospital: pharmacist-led medicines optimisation clinic.

Mohanad Odeh, Claire Scullin, Anita Hogg, Glenda Fleming, Michael G Scott, James C McElnay

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohanad OdehPharmacy Management and Pharmaceutical Care Innovation Centre, Hashemite University, 13133 Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Claire ScullinMedicines Optimisation Innovation Centre (MOIC), Bretten Hall, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim Site, Antrim, UK.
Anita HoggMedicines Optimisation Innovation Centre (MOIC), Bretten Hall, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim Site, Antrim, UK.
Glenda FlemingMedicines Optimisation Innovation Centre (MOIC), Bretten Hall, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim Site, Antrim, UK.
Michael G ScottMedicines Optimisation Innovation Centre (MOIC), Bretten Hall, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim Site, Antrim, UK.
James C McElnayClinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK. j.mcelnay@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9877-2858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background There is a major drive within healthcare to reduce patient readmissions, from patient care and cost perspectives. Pharmacist-led innovations have been demonstrated to enhance patient outcomes. Objective To assess the impact of a post-discharge, pharmacist-led medicines optimisation clinic on readmission parameters. Assessment of the economic, clinical and humanistic outcomes were considered. Setting Respiratory and cardiology wards in a district general hospital in Northern Ireland. Method Randomised, controlled trial. Blinded random sequence generation; a closed envelope-based system, with block randomisation. Adult patients with acute unplanned admission to medical wards subject to inclusion criteria were invited to attend clinic. Analysis was carried out for intention-to-treat and per-protocol perspectives. Main Outcome Measure 30-day readmission rate. Results Readmission rate reduction at 30 days was 9.6% (P = 0.42) and the reduction in multiple readmissions over 180-days was 29.1% (P = 0.003) for the intention-to-treat group (n = 31) compared to the control group (n = 31). Incidence rate ratio for control patients for emergency department visits was 1.65 (95% CI 1.05-2.57, P = 0.029) compared with the intention-to-treat group. For unplanned GP consultations the equivalent incident rate ratio was 2.00 (95% CI 1.18-3.58, P = 0.02). Benefit to cost ratio in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol groups was 20.72 and 21.85 respectively. Patient Health Related Quality of Life was significantly higher at 30-day (P < 0.001), 90-day (P < 0.001) and 180-day (P = 0.036) time points. A positive impact was also demonstrated in relation to patient beliefs about their medicines and medication adherence. Conclusion A pharmacist-led post-discharge medicines optimisation clinic was beneficial from a patient care and cost perspective.

Indexed as

AgedAmbulatory CareEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceNorthern IrelandOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient DischargePatient ReadmissionPharmaceutical ServicesPharmacistsProfessional RoleQuality of LifeCost perspectiveMedicine reviewMedicines optimisation clinicPatient carePharmacist-led servicesReadmissionUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID32524511
PMCPMC7476989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.