SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2020
Pleiotropic effects of antidiabetic agents on renal and cardiovascular outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Efficacy of Novel Antidiabetic Drugs on Albuminuria Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2023Review
- Effects of incretin-based therapeutic agents including tirzepatide on renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systemic review and meta-analysis.Metabolism open · 2023Article
- A real-world study on SGLT2 inhibitors and diabetic kidney disease progression.Clinical kidney journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis meta-analysis was conducted to examine the pleiotropic effects of all available antidiabetic agents except insulin for type 2 diabetes on renal and cardiovascular outcomes.
methodsA systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane database to identify randomized-controlled trials which compared the effectiveness between all antidiabetic agents apart from insulin regarding all aspects of renal and cardiovascular outcomes. Random effect model was utilized to compute for hazard ratio.
resultsNineteen articles with 140,851 participants were included in this meta-analysis. When compared with placebo, SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists, and DPP-4 inhibitors exhibited significantly lower hazard ratios of progression of albuminuria. SGLT-2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors showed a significantly higher hazard ratio of regression of albuminuria. Only SGLT-2 inhibitors illustrated significantly lower hazard ratios of doubling of serum creatinine and incidence of renal replacement therapy (RRT). A significantly lower hazard ratio of composite renal outcome was detected in both SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists. A significantly lower hazard ratio of all-cause mortality was identified in SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonist. Furthermore, a significantly lower hazard ratio of cardiovascular mortality was found in both SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists.
conclusionComparing across all antidiabetic agents apart from insulin, SGLT-2 inhibitors provided extensively renoprotective effects among diabetic patients as well as reduced hazard ratios of heart failure, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. GLP-1 agonists yielded benefits regarding progression of albuminuria, composite renal outcome, and cardiovascular and all-cause mortalities. DPP-4 inhibitors offered only renal protection including progression and regression of albuminuria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.