Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32524461›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2020

Pathological Complete Response Following Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

S Hoendervangers, J P M Burbach, M M Lacle, M Koopman, W M U van Grevenstein, M P W Intven, H M Verkooijen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06097416 (A Phase III, Multi-institutional Randomised Trial Comparing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06097416 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Phase III, Multi-institutional Randomised Trial Comparing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy (NARCT) and Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) in Patients With T3 (a/b/c) Rectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. James's Hospital, IrelandRan2024 to 2030Enrolled100ConditionsRectal CancerArmsNeoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, Total Neoadjuvant Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S HoendervangersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. s.hoendervangers@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7017-9817
J P M BurbachDepartment of Surgery, MC Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
M M LacleDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M KoopmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
W M U van GrevensteinDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M P W IntvenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
H M VerkooijenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is associated with better survival, less local recurrence, and less distant failure. Furthermore, pCR indicates that the rectum may have been preserved. This meta-analysis gives an overview of available neoadjuvant treatment strategies for LARC and analyzes how these perform in achieving pCR as compared with the standard of care.

methodsPubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central bibliographic databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials in which patients received neoadjuvant treatment for MRI-staged nonmetastatic resectable LARC were included. The primary outcome was pCR, defined as ypT0N0. A meta-analysis of studies comparing an intervention with standard fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation (CRT) was performed.

resultsOf the 17 articles included in the systematic review, 11 were used for the meta-analysis. Addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based CRT resulted in significantly more pCR compared with fluoropyrimidine-based CRT only (OR 1.46), but at the expense of more ≥ grade 3 toxicity. Other treatment strategies, including consolidation/induction chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), did not improve pCR rates. None of the included trials reported a benefit in local control or OS. Five-year DFS was significantly worse after SCRT-delay compared with CRT (59% vs. 75.1%, HR 1.93).

conclusionsAll included trials fail to deliver high-level evidence to show an improvement in pCR compared with standard fluoropyrimidine-based CRT. The addition of oxaliplatin might result in more pCR but at the expense of more toxicity. Furthermore, this benefit does not translate into less local recurrence or improved survival.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32524461
PMCPMC7497700
OpenAlexW3033337640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.