Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32524429›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2021

NEURO-LEARN: a Solution for Collaborative Pattern Analysis of Neuroimaging Data.

Bingye Lei, Fengchun Wu, Jing Zhou, Dongsheng Xiong, Kaixi Wang, Lingyin Kong, Pengfei Ke, Jun Chen, Yuping Ning, Xiaobo Li and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bingye LeiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4540-9825
Fengchun WuGuangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Jing ZhouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Dongsheng XiongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Kaixi WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Lingyin KongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Pengfei KeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Jun ChenGuangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Diagnosis and Rehabilitation of Dementia, Guangzhou, 510500, China.
Yuping NingGuangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Xiaobo LiGuangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
Zhiming XiangGuangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Diagnosis and Rehabilitation of Dementia, Guangzhou, 510500, China.
Kai WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China. kaiwu@scut.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of neuroimaging instrumentation has boosted neuroscience researches. Consequently, both the fineness and the cost of data acquisition have profoundly increased, leading to the main bottleneck of this field: limited sample size and high dimensionality of neuroimaging data. Therefore, the emphasis of ideas of data pooling and research collaboration has increased over the past decade. Collaborative analysis techniques emerge as the idea developed. In this paper, we present NEURO-LEARN, a solution for collaborative pattern analysis of neuroimaging data. Its collaboration scheme consists of four parts: projects, data, analysis, and reports. While data preparation workflows defined in projects reduce the high dimensionality of neuroimaging data by collaborative computation, pooling of derived data and sharing of pattern analysis workflows along with generated reports on the Web enlarge the sample size and ensure the reliability and reproducibility of pattern analysis. Incorporating this scheme, NEURO-LEARN provides an easy-to-use Web application that allows users from different sites to share projects and processed data, perform pattern analysis, and obtain result reports. We anticipate that this solution will help neuroscientists to enlarge sample size, conquer the curse of dimensionality and conduct reproducible studies on neuroimaging data with efficiency and validity.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAnimalsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInformation DisseminationNeuroimagingOnline SystemsSoftwareWorkflowCollaborationMachine learningNeuroimagingPattern analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.