Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32524428›Full record

SynthesisNeuroinformatics2021

Reproducible Evaluation of Diffusion MRI Features for Automatic Classification of Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.

Junhao Wen, Jorge Samper-González, Simona Bottani, Alexandre Routier, Ninon Burgos, Thomas Jacquemont, Sabrina Fontanella, Stanley Durrleman, Stéphane Epelbaum, Anne Bertrand and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic loci influence patterns of structural covariance in the human brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Junhao WenInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France. junhao.wen89@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2077-3070
Jorge Samper-GonzálezInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France.
Simona BottaniInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France.
Alexandre RoutierInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France.
Ninon BurgosInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France.
Thomas JacquemontInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France.
Sabrina FontanellaInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France.
Stanley DurrlemanInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France.
Stéphane EpelbaumInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France.
Anne BertrandInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France.
Olivier ColliotInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France. olivier.colliot@upmc.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9836-654X
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
CIHRNIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion MRI is the modality of choice to study alterations of white matter. In past years, various works have used diffusion MRI for automatic classification of Alzheimer's disease. However, classification performance obtained with different approaches is difficult to compare because of variations in components such as input data, participant selection, image preprocessing, feature extraction, feature rescaling (FR), feature selection (FS) and cross-validation (CV) procedures. Moreover, these studies are also difficult to reproduce because these different components are not readily available. In a previous work (Samper-González et al. 2018), we propose an open-source framework for the reproducible evaluation of AD classification from T1-weighted (T1w) MRI and PET data. In the present paper, we first extend this framework to diffusion MRI data. Specifically, we add: conversion of diffusion MRI ADNI data into the BIDS standard and pipelines for diffusion MRI preprocessing and feature extraction. We then apply the framework to compare different components. First, FS has a positive impact on classification results: highest balanced accuracy (BA) improved from 0.76 to 0.82 for task CN vs AD. Secondly, voxel-wise features generally gives better performance than regional features. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) provided comparable results for voxel-wise features. Moreover, we observe that the poor performance obtained in tasks involving MCI were potentially caused by the small data samples, rather than by the data imbalance. Furthermore, no extensive classification difference exists for different degree of smoothing and registration methods. Besides, we demonstrate that using non-nested validation of FS leads to unreliable and over-optimistic results: 5% up to 40% relative increase in BA. Lastly, with proper FR and FS, the performance of diffusion MRI features is comparable to that of T1w MRI. All the code of the framework and the experiments are publicly available: general-purpose tools have been integrated into the Clinica software package ( www.clinica.run ) and the paper-specific code is available at: https://github.com/aramis-lab/AD-ML .

Indexed as

Machine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseBrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleAlzheimer’s diseaseClassificationDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingDTIMachine learningOpen-sourceReproducibility

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.