Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32524082›Full record

ReviewMediterranean journal of rheumatology2019

Biosimilars in the management of chronic inflammatory diseases: The Dutch experience.

Wieland D Müskens, Sanne A A Rongen-van Dartel, Eddy M M Adang, Piet L C M van Riel

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediterranean journal of rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wieland D MüskensDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sanne A A Rongen-van DartelDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eddy M M AdangDepartment of Health Evidence, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Piet L C M van RielDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLTropIQ Health Sciences · NLZiekenhuis Bernhoven · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

These days, the use of biosimilars for the treatment of bio-naive patients is well established. However, the transition of patients being treated with a bio-originator to its biosimilar is still a topic of discussion. The main issue is which approach to use when initiating the non-medical transition. The first real-world examples contain both mandatory and non-mandatory approaches, resulting in a variety of acceptance and discontinuation rates. At this moment a non-mandatory approach, based on shared decision making, is preferred by international guidelines and the Task Force on the Use of Biosimilars to Treat Rheumatological Diseases. However, clear definitions of mandatory and non-mandatory are lacking, as a result of which these terms may be wrongly used in some studies. This article aims to provide an overview of transition approaches used in the Netherlands, and how the approach used relates to acceptance and discontinuation rates of the biosimilar.

Indexed as

biologicalsBiosimilarsnocebo-effectnon-medical switchswitching

Identifiers

PMID32524082
PMCPMC7280871
OpenAlexW3004107433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.