Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32524070›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy2020

CAR T-cell immunotherapy of B-cell malignancy: the story so far.

Leena Halim, John Maher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Oncolytic Virotherapy in Solid Tumors: A Current Review.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The role of CD4Translational cancer research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. CAR-macrophage: Breaking new ground in cellular immunotherapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. CAR T Cell Therapy: A Versatile Living Drug.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leena HalimKing's College London, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4565-2673
John MaherKing's College London, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M024733/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy has achieved unprecedented efficacy in the treatment of chemotherapy-resistant or refractory B-cell malignancies. Promising results from pivotal anti-CD19 CAR T-cell phase II trials have led to landmark approvals of two CD19-specific CAR T-cell products by the United States Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency. However, several issues associated with CAR T-cell treatment remain unresolved, such as the management of severe toxicities and the frequent occurrence of both antigen-positive and antigen-negative relapse. Nonetheless, pre-clinical research is advancing at an unprecedented pace to develop innovative solutions to address these issues. Herein, we summarise recent clinical developments and outcomes of CD19-targeted CAR T-cell immunotherapy and discuss emerging strategies that may further improve the success, safety and broadened applicability of this approach.

Indexed as

B-cellCD19chimeric antigen receptorclinical trialleukaemialymphoma

Identifiers

PMID32524070
PMCPMC7257863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.