Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32524052›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2020

Detection of anomalous high-frequency events in human intracranial EEG.

Krit Charupanit, Indranil Sen-Gupta, Jack J Lin, Beth A Lopour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Optimizing automated detection of high frequency oscillations using visual markings does not improve SOZ localization.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Networks through the lens of high-frequency oscillations.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Unsupervised seizure identification on EEG.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Krit CharupanitBiomedical Engineering University of California, Irvine Irvine CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9803-2005
Indranil Sen-GuptaComprehensive Epilepsy Program Department of Neurology University of California, Irvine Irvine CA USA.
Jack J LinBiomedical Engineering University of California, Irvine Irvine CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1304-227X
Beth A LopourBiomedical Engineering University of California, Irvine Irvine CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4233-4802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHigh-frequency oscillations (HFOs) are a promising biomarker for the epileptogenic zone. However, no physiological definition of an HFO has been established, so detection relies on the empirical definition of an HFO derived from visual observation. This can bias estimates of HFO features such as amplitude and duration, thereby hindering their utility as biomarkers. Therefore, we set out to develop an algorithm that detects high-frequency events in the intracranial EEG that are morphologically distinct from background without requiring assumptions about event amplitude or shape.

methodWe propose the anomaly detection algorithm (ADA), which uses unsupervised machine learning to identify segments of data that are distinct from the background. We apply ADA and a standard HFO detector using a root mean square amplitude threshold to intracranial EEG from 11 patients undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery. The rate, amplitude, and duration of the detected events and the percent overlap between the two detectors are compared.

resultIn the seizure onset zone (SOZ), ADA detected a subset of conventional HFOs. In non-SOZ channels, ADA detected at least twice as many events as the standard approach, including some conventional HFOs; however, ADA also identified many low and intermediate amplitude events missed by the standard amplitude-based method. The rate of ADA events was similar across all channels; however, the amplitude of ADA events was significantly higher in SOZ channels ( SIGNIFICANCE: ADA does not require human supervision, parameter optimization, or prior assumptions about event shape, amplitude, or duration. Our results suggest that the algorithm's estimate of event amplitude may differentiate SOZ and non-SOZ channels. Further studies will examine the utility of HFO amplitude as a biomarker for epilepsy surgical outcome.

Indexed as

automated detection algorithmepilepsy surgeryHigh‐frequency oscillationsmachine learningseizure onset zone

Identifiers

PMID32524052
PMCPMC7278560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.