Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32524041›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2020

Sleep disruption is not observed with brain-responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy.

Leslie Ruoff, Beata Jarosiewicz, Rochelle Zak, Thomas K Tcheng, Thomas C Neylan, Vikram R Rao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A guide to neuromodulation in drug-resistant epilepsy.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leslie RuoffSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System San Francisco CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3477-4683
Beata JarosiewiczNeuroPace, Inc. Mountain View CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1256-5634
Rochelle ZakUniversity of California San Francisco Sleep Disorders Center San Francisco CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8176-8622
Thomas K TchengNeuroPace, Inc. Mountain View CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5491-5295
Thomas C NeylanSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System San Francisco CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1572-2626
Vikram R RaoDepartment of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences University of California San Francisco San Francisco CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6389-2638
University of California, San Francisco · USNeuroPace (United States) · USSan Francisco VA Health Care System · US

Funding

Clinical Features and Neuropathological Basis of Sleep Wake Behavior in Alzheimer's and PSPR01AG060477 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Lea Tenenholz Grinberg, Thomas C Neylan · 2019 to 2026
$8.2M
Linking Sleep Dysfunction to Tau-related Degeneration across AD ProgressionR01AG064314 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRINBERG, LEA TENENHOLZ, NEYLAN, THOMAS C · 2019 to 2023
$4.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060477NIA NIH HHS R01 AG064314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNeurostimulation devices that deliver electrical impulses to the nervous system are widely used to treat seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy, but the effects of these therapies on sleep are incompletely understood. Vagus nerve stimulation can contribute to obstructive sleep apnea, and thalamic deep brain stimulation can cause sleep disruption. A device for brain-responsive neurostimulation (RNS

methodsSix adults with medically refractory focal epilepsy treated for at least six months with the RNS System underwent a single night of polysomnography (PSG). RNS System lead locations included mesial temporal and neocortical targets. Sleep stages and arousals were scored according to standard guidelines. Stimulations delivered by the RNS System in response to detections of epileptiform activity were identified by artifacts on scalp electroencephalography.

resultsOne subject was excluded for technical reasons related to unreliable identification of stimulation artifact on EEG during PSG. In the remaining five subjects, PSG showed fragmented sleep with frequent arousals. Arousal histograms aligned to stimulations revealed a significant peak in arousals just before stimulation. In one of these subjects, the arousal peak began before stimulation and extended ~1 seconds after stimulation. A peak in arousals occurring only after stimulation was not observed. SIGNIFICANCE: In this small cohort of patients, brain-responsive neurostimulation does not appear to disrupt sleep. If confirmed in larger studies, this could represent a potential clinical advantage of brain-responsive neurostimulation over other neurostimulation modalities.

Indexed as

arousalbrain‐responsive neurostimulationepilepsypolysomnographyRNSsleep

Identifiers

PMID32524041
PMCPMC7278540
OpenAlexW3003343073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.