Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32523862›Full record

Article3 Biotech2020

Expression profiling and in silico homology modeling of Inositol penta

Nabaneeta Basak, Veda Krishnan, Vanita Pandey, Mansi Punjabi, Alkesh Hada, Ashish Marathe, Monica Jolly, Bhagath Kumar Palaka, Dinakara R Ampasala, Archana Sachdev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mutation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nabaneeta BasakDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012 India.ORCID 0000-0002-9552-4557
Veda KrishnanDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012 India.
Vanita PandeyDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012 India.ORCID 0000-0002-1286-1110
Mansi PunjabiDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012 India.
Alkesh HadaDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012 India.
Ashish MaratheDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012 India.
Monica JollyDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012 India.
Bhagath Kumar PalakaCentre for Bioinformatics, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605 014 India.
Dinakara R AmpasalaCentre for Bioinformatics, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, 605 014 India.
Archana SachdevDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012 India.ORCID 0000-0002-5165-2522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low phytate soybeans are desirable both from a nutritional and economic standpoint. Inositol 1, 3, 4, 5, 6-penta

Indexed as

Expression profileGmIPK1Intrinsic dynamicsLow phytate traitMolecular modelling

Identifiers

PMID32523862
PMCPMC7253551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.