Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32523609›Full record

ArticleEcology and society : a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability2020

Coerced regimes: management challenges in the Anthropocene.

David G Angeler, Brian C Chaffin, Shana M Sundstrom, Ahjond Garmestani, Kevin L Pope, Daniel R Uden, Dirac Twidwell, Craig R Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and society : a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Conceptualizing Trust and Distrust as Alternative Stable States: Lessons from the Flint Water Crisis.Ecology and society : a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Panarchy and management of lake ecosystems.Ecology and society : a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Iterative scenarios for social-ecological systems.Ecology and society : a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David G AngelerSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Box 7059, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Brian C ChaffinW.A. Franke College of Forestry & Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59801, USA.
Shana M SundstromSchool of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583, USA.
Ahjond GarmestaniU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45268, USA.
Kevin L PopeU.S. Geological Survey-Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, and School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583, USA.
Daniel R UdenDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583, USA.
Dirac TwidwellDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583, USA.
Craig R AllenSchool of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Management frequently creates system conditions that poorly mimic the conditions of a desirable self-organizing regime. Such management is ubiquitous across complex systems of people and nature and will likely intensify as these systems face rapid change. However, it is highly uncertain whether the costs (unintended consequences, including negative side effects) of management but also social dynamics can eventually outweigh benefits in the long term. We introduce the term "coerced regime" to conceptualize this management form and tie it into resilience theory. The concept encompasses proactive and reactive management to maintain desirable and mitigate undesirable regime conditions, respectively. A coerced regime can be quantified through a measure of the amount of management required to artificially maintain its desirable conditions. Coerced regimes comprise "ghosts" of self-sustaining desirable system regimes but ultimately become "dead regimes walking" when these regimes collapse as soon as management is discontinued. We demonstrate the broad application of coerced regimes using distinct complex systems of humans and nature (human subjects, aquatic and terrestrial environments, agriculture, and global climate). We discuss commonalities and differences between these examples to identify tradeoffs between benefits and harms of management. The concept of coerced regimes can spur thinking and inform management about the duality of what we know and can envision

Indexed as

alternative regimescoerced resiliencecoercioninterdisciplinarymanagementmitigationresiliencerestorationsocial-ecological systems

Identifiers

PMID32523609
PMCPMC7286432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.