ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2020
Optimizing the use of Aquacel Ag® for pediatric burns - When to start?
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most pediatric burns are 2nd degree partial thickness, and most will heal spontaneously by providing a good healing environment, though there is no standardized treatment protocol. Aquacel Ag® has shown good clinical results in reducing the need for frequent dressing changes in the pediatric population. This study's goal was to review our experience using this dressing for pediatric partial thickness burns in order to optimize and customize its use. A retrospective study included all pediatric patients suffering from burns, admitted to our institution between July 2013 and May 2018. We investigated a total of 705 dressing changes in our cohort of 276 patients. The most prevalent dressing material was Aquacel Ag®, used in 48% of cases. We examined the pattern of using Aquacel Ag® dressings. The average time until dressing change was required proved to be much longer when applied on the 1st day after burn and onward in comparison to the day of injury (4.85 vs. 2.21 days, p<0.001). Moreover, when it was applied on the 1st day after burn, a dressing used on a superficial 2nd degree burn needed to be changed less often than when it was applied on a deep 2nd degree burn (4.95 vs. 2.29 days, p=0.024). To optimize its use and cost effectiveness, dressing with Aquacel Ag® should be initiated on the 1st day after burn, or on the 2nd day when a deep 2nd degree burn is suspected; until then a standard topical preparation should be used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32523493PMC7263723W3033594483What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.