ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2020
Effects of empirical antibiotic administration on the level of C-Reactive protein and inflammatory markers in severe burn patients.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association of inflammatory biomarkers with overall survival in burn patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Predictive Value of C-Reactive Protein Levels in Adults with Major Burns in Benin City, Nigeria.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2026Article
- Serum Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1, α 1-Acid Glycoprotein, C-Reactive Protein, and Platelet Factor 4 Levels-Promising Molecules That Can Complete the "Puzzle" of the Biochemical Milieu in Severe Burns: Preliminary Results of a Cohort Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Management of Thermal Injuries in Donkeys: A Case Report.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe burns lead to a high level of inflammation and high risk of infection. Inflammatory biomarkers are usually used to predict the severity of inflammation or infection and to assess the efficacy of antibiotics. The use of antibiotics in burns is still controversial. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of empirical antibiotics on level of C-reactive protein (CRP) and other inflammatory markers (leucocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and ratio of neutrophils-lymphocytes) in severe burn patients. This cohort study was conducted in the burn unit of Dr. Soetomo Hospital between April and November 2019. CRP and other inflammatory markers were measured on admission, day 5, and day 7 after the administration of empirical antibiotics. Fifteen severe burn patients were enrolled in this study. All patients received Ceftazidime, 3x1 gram during seven days of hospitalization. CRP level reduced from 15,78±7,5 mg/dl to 14,98±10,29 mg/dl (p=0,705) by paired-t-test. There were no significant differences in mean decline of CRP between day 0-5 and 0-7. There was no decrease in inflammatory markers, including leucocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes and ratio of neutrophils-lymphocytes during seven days of empirical antibiotic administration. Our conclusions are that the administration of ceftazidime as an empirical antibiotic lowers CRP level, although not significantly, while there is no decrease in several inflammatory markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32523491PMC7263725What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.