ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2020
Who needs acetylsalicylic acid? Some order after many studies.
Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Atherosclerosis: From Molecular Biology to Therapeutic Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in cardiovascular prevention is essentially consequence of its ability to inhibit platelet aggregation, thus reducing the impact of atherosclerotic disease. The preventive power of this drug is clear when used in patients with previous cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, stroke, etc.), but the data are less dependable when considering patients who did not experienced a cardiovascular event or in the diabetic population, in whom recent studies reported neutral results in term of efficacy, in face of an increase in the risk of bleeding. Furthermore, the interpretation of the efficacy results of ASA should be reconsidered in light of the increasing clinical complexity, not addressed in the clinical studies on which current evidences are based. Accordingly the rationale for ASA use in cardiovascular prevention is ever more of current interest, and requires a particular attention, considering the crucial role of antithrombotic therapy in the foreseeable future. What could be learned on the use of ASA in cardiovascular prevention after a century since its chemical synthesis? In secondary prevention, supporting evidences have now a couple of decades of history, and the use of the drug appears to be firmly established: in this setting, the benefits clearly surpass the risks. On the other hand, in primary prevention, where age and diabetes are among the main risk factors, the risk/benefit ratio for prophylactic therapy with ASA does not support its widespread use. Deciding when this treatment should be implemented should require a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.