Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32523375›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2020

Prognostic Factors and Local Treatment Modalities of Small-Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: An Analysis According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage.

Ru Huang, Qiyu Gan, Jingxin Cheng

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ru HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai 200120, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5209-1915
Qiyu GanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai 200120, People's Republic of China.
Jingxin ChengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai 200120, People's Republic of China.
Shanghai East Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSmall-cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCCC) is a rare type of cervical cancer. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and survival as well as the optimal local treatment modalities for SCCC. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated the data of patients diagnosed with SCCC between 1988 and 2015 in our institution - those included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and those in the Periodical Database. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression proportional hazard methods were used to evaluate overall survival (OS). A nomogram that could predict OS was constructed based on the Cox proportional hazard model.

resultsIn total, 695 patients were included in this study. The 5-year overall survival in FIGO stage I-IIA and IIB-IV patients was 45.7% and 14.4%, respectively (

conclusionBetter prognosis was associated with negative lymph node status, no lymphatic vasculature, surgery, and early-stage patients. Furthermore, our data showed that the prognosis and treatment pattern varied depending on the FIGO stage, and that optimal treatment modalities included radical surgery for early-stage SCCC and chemoradiotherapy for advanced-stage SCCC. It is helpful to assess the individual prognosis of SCCC patients and choose personalized treatment modalities.

Indexed as

C-indexCOX risk regression modelnomogramprognosistreatment modalities

Identifiers

PMID32523375
PMCPMC7236046
OpenAlexW3025377147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.