Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32523299›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2020

The role of anterolateral augmentation in primary ACL reconstruction.

David Ferguson, Rory Cuthbert, Saket Tibrewal

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David FergusonDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Barnet General Hospital, Royal Free Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, EN5 3DJ, London, UK.
Rory CuthbertDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E1 1BB, UK.
Saket TibrewalDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust, University Hospital Lewisham, High Street, London, SE13 6LH, UK.
Royal London Hospital · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Lewisham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anterolateral soft tissue envelope of the knee has long been recognised as a key stabilising structure. Once the mainstay of operative management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture, interest in the area fell away with the advent of intraarticular arthroscopic reconstruction. Renewed interest in these structures together with cadaveric data evidencing the potential for restoration of near normal knee biomechanics following ACL and anterolateral soft tissue reconstruction has driven current concepts and development of operative techniques. Options for current anterolateral augmentation techniques in primary ACL reconstruction plus patient selection considerations are reviewed, together with an outlook at future research key to development of this area.

Indexed as

ACLALLAnterolateralAugmentationExtra-articularReconstructionTenodesis

Identifiers

PMID32523299
PMCPMC7275283
OpenAlexW2979592920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.