Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32523270›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2020

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-an Indian Perspective.

Ravi Arjunan, Tiwari Ajeet Ramamani, Chowdappa Ramachandra, Krishnamurthy Swamyvelu, Srinivas Chunduri, Syed Althaf, Amirtham Usha, Ranganath Namrata

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ravi ArjunanDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Cancer Institute, Bangalore, India.
Tiwari Ajeet RamamaniDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Cancer Institute, Bangalore, India.
Chowdappa RamachandraDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Cancer Institute, Bangalore, India.
Krishnamurthy SwamyveluDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Cancer Institute, Bangalore, India.
Srinivas ChunduriDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Cancer Institute, Bangalore, India.
Syed AlthafDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Kidwai Cancer Institute, Bangalore, India.
Amirtham UshaDepartment of Pathology, Kidwai Cancer Institute, Bangalore, India.
Ranganath NamrataDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Relief, Kidwai Cancer Institute, Bangalore, India.
Cancer Institute (WIA) · INKidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone in early breast cancer is an established standard of care. However, the same results have not been replicated in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We aim to examine the feasibility of SLNB in LABC patients post NACT to determine identification rates (IR) and false negative rates (FNR). This was a single tertiary cancer center-based prospective study from February 2017 to November 2018. Forty-four patients with LABC (T3, T4 with N0 or N1) were studied and response after NACT was assessed. Only those patients who were N0 or who converted from N1 to N0 after NACT were included. Those patients who remained node positive after NACT directly proceeded with axillary dissection without SLNB and were excluded from the study. Demographic and clinical data is expressed in ratios and percentage and presented in table format. The median age at the time of study was 45.18 years. Most of the patients had T3 and above (97.7%) and N1 (86.3%) disease at the start of neoadjuvant therapy. The mean number of axillary lymph nodes dissected was 13.97. Dual method of sentinel lymph node mapping (methylene blue dye and radiolabeled colloid) was used in 26 (59.1%) patients. At least 1 SLN was identified in 86.4% patients with 100% identification in those patients in whom the dual method of SLN mapping was used. Median of 2 SLN was removed. Overall, false negative rate was 21.4%. FNR was high with the single method of SLN mapping (50% and 33.3% with methylene blue and radioactive colloid respectively) while it was considerably low when both were used simultaneously (11%). An average of 2 (range 0-4) SLN were identified and FNR were zero when 2 or more SLN were identified. Our study shows that SLNB in patients with LABC post NACT though viable cannot be recommended at present due to unacceptable high FNR. However, this should not dissuade us from exploring recurrence-free survival and overall survival associated with such IR and FNR albeit strictly under a clinical trial setting.

Indexed as

False negative rateIdentification rateLocally advanced breast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapySentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID32523270
PMCPMC7260325
OpenAlexW2999962031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.