Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32523267›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2020

Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Prognostic Factors and Outcomes of a Series of Patients Treated at a Single Institution.

Shraddha Patkar, Abhay K Kattepur, Rajesh Shinde, Mahesh Goel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: a Current Review on Management.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shraddha PatkarDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, 400012 India.
Abhay K KattepurDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, 400012 India.
Rajesh ShindeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, 400012 India.
Mahesh GoelDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, 400012 India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare heterogeneous tumors arising in the retroperitoneum with unique biological and behavioral patterns that are thought to be closely linked to histology. The aim of the study was to audit our results and analyze various clinico-pathological factors including surgical excision, histology, and their implications on the recurrences and survival outcomes in RPS. Retrospective analysis of patients treated at a tertiary referral center in India from March 2008 to July 2017 was performed. The clinico-pathological variables were analyzed for their association with tumor recurrence and survival with special emphasis on histological subtype. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). One hundred consecutive patients operated for RPS were analyzed. Of these, 27 were operated for recurrent tumors. Liposarcomas (LPS) and leiomyosarcomas (LMS) constituted 50% (

Indexed as

GradeHistologyMultivisceral resectionRetroperitoneal sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID32523267
PMCPMC7260296
OpenAlexW2998794093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.