Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32523094›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Autologous fecal transplantation from a lean state potentiates caloric restriction effects on body weight and adiposity in obese mice.

Patricia Pérez-Matute, María Íñiguez, María de Toro, Emma Recio-Fernández, José A Oteo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Murine Fecal Isolation and Microbiota Transplantation.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rejuvenating the human gut microbiome.Trends in molecular medicine · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia Pérez-MatuteInfectious Diseases, Microbiota and Metabolism Unit. Infectious Diseases Department, Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), Logroño, La Rioja, Spain. cpperez@riojasalud.es.
María ÍñiguezInfectious Diseases, Microbiota and Metabolism Unit. Infectious Diseases Department, Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
María de ToroGenomics & Bioinformatics Core Facility. CIBIR, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
Emma Recio-FernándezInfectious Diseases, Microbiota and Metabolism Unit. Infectious Diseases Department, Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
José A OteoInfectious Diseases Department. Hospital San Pedro, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja · ESHospital San Pedro · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous fecal transplantation (FT-A) emerges as a promising strategy to modulate gut microbiota with minimal side effects since individual´s own feces are transplanted. With the premise of improving obesity and its associated disorders, we investigated if fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), heterologous and autologous, potentiates the effects of a moderate caloric restriction (CR) in high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mice. Mice were randomized into control, HFD, CR (12 weeks on HFD and 6 weeks under CR), FT-H (similar to CR and FMT carried out with feces from controls, weeks 17 & 18), and FT-A (administration of their own feces before developing obesity at weeks 17 & 18). Our study demonstrated that FMT, and, especially, FT-A potentiates the effects of a moderate CR on weight loss and adiposity in the short term, by decreasing feed efficiency and increasing adipose tissue lipolysis. Although FT-A produced a significant increase in bacterial richness/diversity, FMT did not significantly modify gut microbiota composition compared to the CR at phyla and bacteria genera levels, and only significant increases in Bifidobacterium and Blautia genera were observed. These results could suggest that other mechanisms different from bacterial microbiota engraftment participates in these beneficial effects. Thus, FT-A represents a very positive synergetic approach for obese patients that do not respond well to moderate restrictive diets.

Indexed as

Fecal Microbiota TransplantationAdiposityAnimalsBody WeightCaloric RestrictionDisease Models, AnimalFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, ObeseObesityTransplantation, Autologous

Identifiers

PMID32523094
PMCPMC7287061
OpenAlexW3034040497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.