Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32522991›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Distinct metabolic states of a cell guide alternate fates of mutational buffering through altered proteostasis.

Kanika Verma, Kanika Saxena, Rajashekar Donaka, Aseem Chaphalkar, Manish Kumar Rai, Anurag Shukla, Zainab Zaidi, Rohan Dandage, Dhanasekaran Shanmugam, Kausik Chakraborty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Conserved and divergent chaperoning effects of Hsp60/10 chaperonins on protein folding landscapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Kanika Verma *CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Mathura Road, Delhi, 110025, India.
Kanika Saxena *CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Mathura Road, Delhi, 110025, India.
Rajashekar DonakaCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Mathura Road, Delhi, 110025, India.
Aseem ChaphalkarCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Mathura Road, Delhi, 110025, India.
Manish Kumar RaiCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Mathura Road, Delhi, 110025, India.
Anurag ShuklaAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research, CSIR-HRDC, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India.
Zainab ZaidiCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Mathura Road, Delhi, 110025, India.
Rohan DandageCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Mathura Road, Delhi, 110025, India.
Dhanasekaran ShanmugamAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research, CSIR-HRDC, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3341-4846
Kausik ChakrabortyCSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, Mathura Road, Delhi, 110025, India. kausik@igib.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6000-8379
Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology · INNational Chemical Laboratory · IN

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic changes alter the cellular milieu; can this also change intracellular protein folding? Since proteostasis can modulate mutational buffering, if change in metabolism has the ability to change protein folding, arguably, it should also alter mutational buffering. Here we find that altered cellular metabolic states in E. coli buffer distinct mutations on model proteins. Buffered-mutants have folding problems in vivo and are differently chaperoned in different metabolic states. Notably, this assistance is dependent upon the metabolites and not on the increase in canonical chaperone machineries. Being able to reconstitute the folding assistance afforded by metabolites in vitro, we propose that changes in metabolite concentrations have the potential to alter protein folding capacity. Collectively, we unravel that the metabolite pools are bona fide members of proteostasis and aid in mutational buffering. Given the plasticity in cellular metabolism, we posit that metabolic alterations may play an important role in cellular proteostasis.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliMetabolomeMutationOsmotic PressureProtein FoldingProteostasis

Identifiers

PMID32522991
PMCPMC7286901
OpenAlexW3033083994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.