Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32522974›Full record

Observational studyRevista espanola de salud publica2020

[Intimate partner violence in pregnant women: predisposing factors.]

Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Juan Miguel Martínez-GalianoDepartamento de Enfermería. Universidad de Jaén. Jaén. España.
Miguel Delgado-RodríguezConsorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP). Madrid. España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIntimate partner violence is a serious health problem worldwide and should be a priority issue for policy makers. Having adequate information helps to develop strategies to eradicate this scourge. The objective of this study was to determine the factors associated with situations of intimate partner violence during pregnancy.

methodsDuring 2015 a cross-sectional study was carried out in pregnant women in southern Spain. Information on sociodemographic variables, information on pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium was collected through interviews and official clinical documents. To determine the situation of violence, the Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST) was used in its short version. Comparisons of means were made using the t test; chi square and binary regression, as well as the Mann-Whitney U test or the Kruskal-Wallis test for variables that did not follow a normal distribution were used.

results141 women participated in the study; the percentage of women in situations of intimate partner violence during pregnancy was 31.2% (44). A low level of education for women's partners, multiparous women, coexistence with people who require care and care, single marital status, women's partners were unemployed, women not having a permanent employment and having an unwanted pregnancy seem be predisposing factors for a situation of intimate partner violence during pregnancy (p<0.05).

conclusionsCertain social factors, such as educational level and job stability, can influence the existence of intimate partner violence during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeopleAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceMiddle AgedPregnancyRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsSpainYoung AdultFactors associated with abuseGender violenceIntimate partner violencePregnancyRiskSpain

Identifiers

PMID32522974
PMCPMC11582858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.