Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32522513›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020

Special ambulatory gynecologic considerations in the era of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and implications for future practice.

Megan A Cohen, Anna M Powell, Jenell S Coleman, Jean M Keller, Alison Livingston, Jean R Anderson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Intimate Partner Violence in the COVID-19 Era: A Health, Psychological, Forensic and Legal Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Perinatal Behavioral Health, the COVID-19 Pandemic, and a Social Determinants of Health Framework.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2021
    Article
  19. COVID-19 Remote Consultation Services and Population in Health Inequity-Concentrating Territories: A Scoping Review.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan A CohenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins HIV Women's Health Program, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: mcohen82@jhu.edu.
Anna M PowellDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins HIV Women's Health Program, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Jenell S ColemanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins HIV Women's Health Program, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Jean M KellerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins HIV Women's Health Program, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Alison LivingstonDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins HIV Women's Health Program, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Jean R AndersonDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Johns Hopkins HIV Women's Health Program, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Women's Health Research at MUSCK12HD055885 · NICHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI MCGINTY, JACQUELINE F. · 2007 to 2021
$7.2M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has altered medical practice in unprecedented ways. Although much of the emphasis in obstetrics and gynecology to date has been on the as yet uncertain effects of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy and on changes to surgical management, the pandemic has broad implications for ambulatory gynecologic care. In this article, we review important ambulatory gynecologic topics such as safety and mental health, reproductive life planning, sexually transmitted infections, and routine screening for breast and cervical cancer. For each topic, we review how care may be modified during the pandemic, provide recommendations when possible on how to ensure continued access to comprehensive healthcare at this time, and discuss ways that future practice may change. Social distancing requirements may place patients at higher risk for intimate partner violence and mental health concerns, threaten continued access to contraception and abortion services, affect prepregnancy planning, interrupt routine screening for breast and cervical cancer, increase risk of sexually transmitted infection acquisition and decrease access to treatment, and exacerbate already underlying racial and minority disparities in care and health outcomes. We advocate for increased use of telemedicine services with increased screening for intimate partner violence and depression using validated questionnaires. Appointments for long-acting contraceptive insertions can be prioritized. Easier access to patient-controlled injectable contraception and pharmacist-provided hormonal contraception can be facilitated. Reproductive healthcare access can be ensured through reducing needs for ultrasonography and laboratory testing for certain eligible patients desiring abortion and conducting phone follow-up for medication abortions. Priority for in-person appointments should be given to patients with sexually transmitted infection symptoms, particularly if at risk for complications, while also offering expedited partner therapy. Although routine mammography screening and cervical cancer screening may be safely delayed, we discuss society guideline recommendations for higher-risk populations. There may be an increasing role for patient-collected human papillomavirus self-samples using new cervical cancer screening guidelines that can be expanded considering the pandemic situation. Although the pandemic has strained our healthcare system, it also affords ambulatory clinicians with opportunities to expand care to vulnerable populations in ways that were previously underutilized to improve health equity.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareBetacoronavirusGynecologyContraceptionCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Early Detection of CancerFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansMental HealthPandemicsPneumonia, ViralPregnancySARS-CoV-2Sex Offensesabortioncervical cancer screeningcontraceptioncoronavirus disease 2019health equityintimate partner violencereproductive healthcare accesstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32522513
PMCPMC7832936
OpenAlexW3034149829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.