Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32522312›Full record

ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2020

The prevalence of mental disorders and patterns of comorbidity within a large sample of mentally ill prisoners: A network analysis.

Nora van Buitenen, Chantal J W van den Berg, Jesse Meijers, Joke M Harte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. How pharmacology can aid in the diagnosis of mental disorders.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mental and behavioral disorders in the prison context.Revista espanola de sanidad penitenciaria
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nora van BuitenenJudicial Complex Zaanstad, Westzaan, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5744-9912
Chantal J W van den BergDepartment of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jesse MeijersJudicial Complex Zaanstad, Westzaan, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7607-2321
Joke M HarteDepartment of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3035-9095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComorbidity has profound implications in both the clinical field and research, yet little is known about the prevalence and structure of comorbid mental disorders. This article aims not only to present data on the prevalence of mental disorders and comorbidity, but also to explore relationships between comorbid mental disorders by using a network approach.

methodsData used in this cross-sectional study are part of a prospective cohort study within penitentiary psychiatric centers (PPCs) in the Netherlands. It includes DSM diagnoses of 5,257 unique male patients incarcerated in one of the PPC's. Prevalence rates of mental disorders and comorbidity were calculated, the network of comorbid DSM diagnoses was constructed using regression coefficients.

resultsSchizophrenia spectrum and substance-related disorders were most prevalent within this sample (56.7 and 43.1%, respectively), and over half of all patients were diagnosed with a comorbid disorder (56.9%). Four distinctive groups of disorders emerged from the network analysis of DSM diagnoses: substance use, impulsivity, poor social skills, and disruptive behaviors. Psychotic disorders were considered as a separate group as it was unconnected to other disorders.

conclusionsComorbid mental disorders can be described, at least in part, as connected networks. Underlying attributes as well as direct influences of mental disorders on one another seem to be affecting the presence of comorbidity. Results could contribute to the understanding of a possible causal relation between psychopathology and criminal behavior and the development of treatment programs targeting groups of disorders.

Indexed as

ComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleMental DisordersNetherlandsPersons with Psychiatric DisordersPrevalencePrisonersProspective StudiesPsychopathologyPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaSubstance-Related DisordersClinical phenotypescomorbidityforensic psychiatrynetwork analysispsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID32522312
PMCPMC7355171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.