Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32522285›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2020

Topography of the respiratory tract bacterial microbiota in cattle.

Christopher McMullen, Trevor W Alexander, Renaud Léguillette, Matthew Workentine, Edouard Timsit

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Detection of bovine respiratory disease complex-related pathogens in nasopharynx-associated lymphoid tissue.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher McMullenFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8408-4851
Trevor W AlexanderLethbridge Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
Renaud LéguilletteFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Matthew WorkentineFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Edouard TimsitFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Edouard.timsit@Ceva.com.
University of Calgary · CAAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAAlberta Health Services · CA

Funding

Beef Cattle Research Council AMR.10.17Simpson Ranch Chair in Beef Cattle Health and Wellness at the University of Calgary 10018296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacterial bronchopneumonia (BP) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in cattle. The nasopharynx is generally accepted as the primary source of pathogenic bacteria that cause BP. However, it has recently been shown in humans that the oropharynx may act as the primary reservoir for pathogens that reach the lung. The objective was therefore to describe the bacterial microbiota present along the entire cattle respiratory tract to determine which upper respiratory tract (URT) niches may contribute the most to the composition of the lung microbiota.

methodsSeventeen upper and lower respiratory tract locations were sampled from 15 healthy feedlot steer calves. Samples were collected using a combination of swabs, protected specimen brushes, and saline washes. DNA was extracted from each sample and the 16S rRNA gene (V3-V4) was sequenced. Community composition, alpha-diversity, and beta-diversity were compared among sampling locations.

resultsMicrobiota composition differed across sampling locations, with physiologically and anatomically distinct locations showing different relative abundances of 1137 observed sequence variants (SVs). An analysis of similarities showed that the lung was more similar to the nasopharynx (R-statistic = 0.091) than it was to the oropharynx (R-statistic = 0.709) or any other URT sampling location. Five distinct metacommunities were identified across all samples after clustering at the genus level using Dirichlet multinomial mixtures. This included a metacommunity found primarily in the lung and nasopharynx that was dominated by Mycoplasma. Further clustering at the SV level showed a shared metacommunity between the lung and nasopharynx that was dominated by Mycoplasma dispar. Other metacommunities found in the nostrils, tonsils, and oral microbiotas were dominated by Moraxella, Fusobacterium, and Streptococcus, respectively.

conclusionsThe nasopharyngeal bacterial microbiota is most similar to the lung bacterial microbiota in healthy cattle and therefore may serve as the primary source of bacteria to the lung. This finding indicates that the nasopharynx is likely the most important location that should be targeted when doing bovine respiratory microbiota research. Video abstract.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaCattleDNA, BacterialMaleNasopharynxRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAntibiotic freeBovine respiratory diseaseMicrobiomeNatural cattle

Identifiers

PMID32522285
PMCPMC7288481
OpenAlexW3033028161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.