Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32522242›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2020

Inpatient stroke rehabilitation: prediction of clinical outcomes using a machine-learning approach.

Yaar Harari, Megan K O'Brien, Richard L Lieber, Arun Jayaraman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yaar HarariMax Nader Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E. Erie St., Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Megan K O'BrienMax Nader Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E. Erie St., Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Richard L LieberDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Arun JayaramanMax Nader Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, 355 E. Erie St., Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. a-jayaraman@northwestern.edu.
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND REHABILITATION OF NEURAL DYSFUNCTIONT32HD007418 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Levi John Hargrove · 1992 to 2026
$6.5M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007418NIH HHS T32HD007418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn clinical practice, therapists often rely on clinical outcome measures to quantify a patient's impairment and function. Predicting a patient's discharge outcome using baseline clinical information may help clinicians design more targeted treatment strategies and better anticipate the patient's assistive needs and discharge care plan. The objective of this study was to develop predictive models for four standardized clinical outcome measures (Functional Independence Measure, Ten-Meter Walk Test, Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale) during inpatient rehabilitation.

methodsFifty stroke survivors admitted to a United States inpatient rehabilitation hospital participated in this study. Predictors chosen for the clinical discharge scores included demographics, stroke characteristics, and scores of clinical tests at admission. We used the Pearson product-moment and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients to calculate correlations among clinical outcome measures and predictors, a cross-validated Lasso regression to develop predictive equations for discharge scores of each clinical outcome measure, and a Random Forest based permutation analysis to compare the relative importance of the predictors.

resultsThe predictive equations explained 70-77% of the variance in discharge scores and resulted in a normalized error of 13-15% for predicting the outcomes of new patients. The most important predictors were clinical test scores at admission. Additional variables that affected the discharge score of at least one clinical outcome were time from stroke onset to rehabilitation admission, age, sex, body mass index, race, and diagnosis of dysphasia or speech impairment.

conclusionsThe models presented in this study could help clinicians and researchers to predict the discharge scores of clinical outcomes for individuals enrolled in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation program that adheres to U.S. Medicare standards.

Indexed as

Machine LearningOutcome Assessment, Health CareTreatment OutcomeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedStrokeStroke RehabilitationUnited StatesYoung AdultBalanceFunctional Independence measureGaitLasso regressionPhysical therapy

Identifiers

PMID32522242
PMCPMC7288489
OpenAlexW3033146450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.