ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2020
Patient and clinician opinions of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of patients with rare diseases: a qualitative study.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electronic patient-reported outcome platforms used in hematological cancers: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Assessing the effectiveness of measurement scales in evaluating the health-related quality of life in rare disease patients after treatment: a systematic review.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Recommendations for the use of clinical outcome assessments in rare disease drug development.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Requirements for patient-reported outcomes and data analytics in health technology assessment in England, France and Germany, and the need for methods harmonization across European markets: a qualitative interview study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Measurement of the impact of giant cell arteritis and treatment with glucocorticoids on health-related quality of life.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Review
- Trial Readiness: Understanding the Natural History of Rare Diseases.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Review
- Patients' experiences of responding to a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for palliative care: a mixed method study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life, Psychological Health, and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients in China.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Understanding Value-Based Healthcare: Qualitative Insights From Nurses and Nursing Managers in Hospital Settings.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
- Patient-reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day case surgery (POPPY): methodology for a prospective, multicentre observational study.Anaesthesia · 2025Observational
- Assessing Whole-Person Outcomes During Routine Clinical Care: A Rapid Scoping Review.Medical care · 2024Article
- Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (e-PROMs) in Pediatric Palliative Oncology Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of palliative care · 2024Article
- What are the perspectives of patients with hand and wrist conditions, chronic pain, and patients recovering from stroke on the use of patient and outcome information in everyday care? A Mixed-Methods study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Article
- Understanding providers' perspectives using patient-reported outcomes in a pain management setting: a pilot study.Pain management · 2024Article
- 'It is important to feel invited': what patients require when using the Utrecht Symptom Diary - 4 Dimensional, a qualitative exploration.Palliative care and social practice · 2024Article
- Ethical and practical considerations related to data sharing when collecting patient-reported outcomes in care-based child health research.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Improving the Understanding and Managing of the Quality of Life of Patients With Lung Cancer With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRare diseases may be life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions. Patient care needs are often complex and challenging to coordinate and deliver effectively. Rare diseases and their clinical management may therefore substantially impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may complement clinical assessments by elucidating patients' perspectives on their health status and care priorities. This study explored the opinions of patients and clinicians on the use of PROMs in the management of patients with rare diseases in routine clinical practice.
methodsA total of 15 semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted with four patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC); five renal transplant recipients; and six PSC doctors from University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB) NHS Foundation Trust. A focus group session was also conducted with 10 clinical staff members (doctors, nurses and other allied health professionals from UHB). The suitability and acceptability of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) and the Short Form 12 (SF12) were assessed by patients with PSC and their doctors while the Paediatric quality of life inventory Transplant Module (PedsQL-TM) and the EuroQoL-5 dimensions (EQ. 5D) were evaluated by the renal transplant recipients and their doctors. The discussions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Coding of the transcripts was done using the Nvivo 11 Plus software. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify the main themes and subthemes.
resultsFour themes were identified, namely: (i) potential benefits of PROMs in the management of rare diseases; (ii) views on selected questionnaires; (iii) practical considerations for implementation; and (iv) potential facilitators and barriers of implementation. Patients and clinicians suggested that the use of ePROMs may facilitate patient-centred care by promoting patient-clinician communication, highlighting aspects of HRQOL that are important to patients and encouraging patient involvement in their care. They also felt that the disease-specific CLDQ and PedsQL-TM were more relevant than the generic SF12 and EQ-5D.
conclusionsPatients with rare diseases often experience impaired HRQOL. The use of an ePROM system may enhance the routine management of patients with rare diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.