Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32522181›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2020

Persistence and treatment patterns of fixed combination drugs for glaucoma: a retrospective claims database study in Japan.

Kenji Kashiwagi, Eriko Chono, Sarah Koesters, Poh Sin Yap

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Persistence with medical glaucoma therapy in newly diagnosed patients.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Association between topical β-blocker use and asthma attacks in glaucoma patients with asthma: a cohort study using a claims database.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  8. iStentInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kenji KashiwagiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamanashi University, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi, Japan. kenjik@yamanashi.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8506-8503
Eriko ChonoNovartis Pharma K.K, Tokyo, Japan.
Sarah KoestersNovartis Ireland Ltd., Dublin, Ireland.
Poh Sin YapNovartis Corporation Sdn. Bhd, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
Novartis (Ireland) · IENovartis (Japan) · JPUniversity of Yamanashi Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor persistence with glaucoma therapy can lead to disease progression and subsequent blindness. Persistence with second-line glaucoma combination treatment in a Japanese real-world setting and whether it differed from fixed and unfixed combination drugs was investigated.

methodsThis was a retrospective, non-interventional, cohort study using data from a Japanese medical claims database. Patients with glaucoma aged ≥20 years with a first drug claim for glaucoma treatment between 01 July 2005 and 30 October 2014 and with data for > 6 months before and after this first prescription were included. The primary endpoint was duration of drug persistence among glaucoma patients with and without the use of fixed combination drugs in the year following initiation of second-line combination treatment.

resultsOf 1403 patients included in the analysis, 364 (25.94%) received fixed combination drugs and 1039 (74.06%) received unfixed combination drugs as second-line treatment. Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between the groups. A total of 39.01% of patients on fixed combination drugs, compared with 41.67% of patients on unfixed combination drugs, persisted on their glaucoma drugs 12 months post second-index date. Median persistence durations for the fixed combination drugs and unfixed combination drugs groups were 6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5-8) and 7 months (95% CI 6-9), respectively. Patients who received prostaglandin analogs (PGAs) were the most persistent with their treatment (n = 99, 12.84%). Patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma were less likely to experience treatment modification (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.800, 95% CI 0.649-0.986, P = 0.036), while those diagnosed with secondary glaucoma were more likely to experience treatment modification (HR: 1.678, 95% CI 1.231-2.288, P = 0.001) compared with glaucoma suspects.

conclusionsIn this retrospective claims database study, the persistence rate of second-line glaucoma combination treatment was low, with no difference in persistence between glaucoma patients receiving unfixed combination drugs compared with fixed combination drugs. Patients on PGA showed greater persistence rates compared with other treatments.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsCarbonic Anhydrase InhibitorsDatabases, FactualDrug CombinationsFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansInsurance, Health, ReimbursementIntraocular PressureJapanMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedOcular HypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsCarbonic Anhydrase InhibitorsDrug CombinationsProstaglandins, SyntheticTimololClaims databaseCombination therapyFixed combinationGlaucomaPersistenceTopical treatmentTreatment pattern

Identifiers

PMID32522181
PMCPMC7288414
OpenAlexW3033238325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.