Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32522168›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Social inequalities in traditional and emerging screen devices among Portuguese children: a cross-sectional study.

Daniela Rodrigues, Augusta Gama, Aristides M Machado-Rodrigues, Helena Nogueira, Maria-Raquel G Silva, Vítor Rosado-Marques, Cristina Padez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Children and Adolescent's Perception of Media Device Use Consequences.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniela RodriguesCIAS - Research Centre for Anthropology and Health, University of Coimbra, Ed. São Bento, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal. rodrigues1323@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4559-4303
Augusta GamaCIAS - Research Centre for Anthropology and Health, University of Coimbra, Ed. São Bento, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal.
Aristides M Machado-RodriguesCIAS - Research Centre for Anthropology and Health, University of Coimbra, Ed. São Bento, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal.
Helena NogueiraCIAS - Research Centre for Anthropology and Health, University of Coimbra, Ed. São Bento, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal.
Maria-Raquel G SilvaCIAS - Research Centre for Anthropology and Health, University of Coimbra, Ed. São Bento, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal.
Vítor Rosado-MarquesCIAS - Research Centre for Anthropology and Health, University of Coimbra, Ed. São Bento, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal.
Cristina PadezCIAS - Research Centre for Anthropology and Health, University of Coimbra, Ed. São Bento, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456, Coimbra, Portugal.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/DTP-SAP/1520/2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren are often exposed to too much screen time but few studies have explored the use of old and new digital media among young children. This study assesses screen time, including traditional and mobile devices, in pre-school and elementary school-aged children, according to their gender, age, and socioeconomic position (SEP).

methodsA total of 8430 children (3 to 10 years; 50.8% boys) from the north, center and south-central Portugal were included in the present study. Data was collected by a parental questionnaire during 2016/2017. Children's screen time (by media device, weekdays and at the weekend; calculated by mean minutes per day) were reported by parents. Analysis were carried to compare screen time by children's age, gender and family SEP (classified using father's educational degree).

resultsDaily screen time was high both in children aged 3 to 5 and 6 to 10 years - 154 min/day (95% CI: 149.51-158.91) and 200.79 min/day (95% CI: 197.08-204.50), respectively - and the majority of children, independently of their gender, exceed the recommended 2 h/day of screen viewing. Children are still primarily engaging in screen time through television but the use of mobile devices, particularly tablets, were already high among 3 year-old children and increased with age. SEP was a negative predictor of screen time in the linear regression analysis, including after adjustment.

conclusionsConsidering the negative health impacts of excessive screen time, recognizing subgroups at risk of excessive screen time and identifying how each device is used according to age is fundamental to enable appropriate future interventions. The screen time in children aged 3-10 years is longer than the recommended, particularly among boys and in those children from lower SEP. Parents and policymakers should have in mind that children spend most of their screen time watching television but mobile devices are becoming extremely popular starting at a young age.

Indexed as

Screen TimeAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolComputersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInternetMalePortugalRegression AnalysisSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsTelevisionChildrenMobile devicesPortugalPreschoolScreen timeSocioeconomic inequalitiesTelevision

Identifiers

PMID32522168
PMCPMC7288526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.