Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32522143›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2020

The prevalence of headache disorders in children and adolescents in Lithuania: a schools-based study.

Diana Genc, Nerija Vaičienė-Magistris, Apolinaras Zaborskis, Tayyar Şaşmaz, Aylin Yeniocak Tunç, Derya Uluduz, Timothy J Steiner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Diana GencDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Nerija Vaičienė-MagistrisDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Apolinaras ZaborskisDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Research Institute, Faculty of Public Health, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Tayyar ŞaşmazDepartment of Public Health, Mersin University School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey.
Aylin Yeniocak TunçDepartment of Public Health, Mersin University School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey.
Derya UluduzNeurology Department, Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Timothy J SteinerDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Edvard Griegs gate, Trondheim, Norway. t.steiner@imperial.ac.uk.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTMersin Üniversitesi · TRIstanbul University · TRNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study reports headache disorders as the second-highest cause of disability worldwide, the headache data in GBD come very largely from adults. This national study in Lithuania was part of a global schools-based programme within the Global Campaign against Headache contributing data from children (7-11 years) and adolescents (12-17 years).

methodsThe methods followed the generic protocol for the global study. The basic study design was a cross-sectional survey. Self-completed structured questionnaires were administered, within classes, in 24 schools selected from seven regions of Lithuania to be nationally representative. Headache diagnostic questions were based on ICHD-3 beta criteria but for the inclusion of undifferentiated headache (UdH).

resultsOf 3714 potential participants, 2505 (children 1382 [55.2%], adolescents 1123 [44.8%]; males 1169 [46.7%], females 1336 [53.3%]) completed the questionnaire. Adolescents and males were therefore relatively under-represented, with non-participation (32.6%) due in most cases to lack of parental consent. Observed lifetime prevalence of headache was 92.2%. Gender- and age-adjusted 1-year prevalence was 76.6% (migraine: 21.4%; tension-type headache [TTH]: 25.6%; UdH: 24.0%; all headache on ≥15 days/month: 3.9%; probable medication-overuse headache: 0.8%). All headache types except UdH were more prevalent among females than males, and among adolescents than children. UdH showed a complex relationship with age, but represented 38.0% of all reported headache in children, 27.4% in adolescents. Headache yesterday (HY) was reported by 17.5%, almost double the 9.8% predicted from prevalence and headache frequency to have headache on any day. The reason was unclear.

conclusionsFindings were not very different from those reported in Turkey and Austria, but with more TTH. Headache has, therefore, again been shown to be common in children and adolescents, and UdH confirmed as a headache type that must be recognised and included in accounts of headache in these age groups.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGlobal Burden of DiseaseHeadacheHeadache DisordersHeadache Disorders, SecondaryHumansLithuaniaMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersPrevalenceSchoolsChild and adolescent headacheEpidemiologyGlobal campaign against headacheLithuaniaMedication-overuse headacheMigrainePrevalenceSchools-based studyTension-type headacheUndifferentiated headache

Identifiers

PMID32522143
PMCPMC7288438
OpenAlexW3033668477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.