Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32522112›Full record

ArticleHealth security

Who Should We Fear More: Biohackers, Disgruntled Postdocs, or Bad Governments? A Simple Risk Chain Model of Biorisk.

Anders Sandberg, Cassidy Nelson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health security. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Anders SandbergAnders Sandberg, PhD, is a Senior Research Fellow; Cassidy Nelson, MBBS, MPH, is a Research Scholar; both are at the Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Cassidy NelsonAnders Sandberg, PhD, is a Senior Research Fellow; Cassidy Nelson, MBBS, MPH, is a Research Scholar; both are at the Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Hudson Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological risk landscape continues to evolve as developments in synthetic biology and biotechnology offer increasingly powerful tools to a widening pool of actors, including those who may consider carrying out a deliberate biological attack. However, it remains unclear whether it is the relatively large numbers of low-resourced actors or the small handful of high-powered actors who pose a greater biosecurity risk. To answer this question, this paper introduces a simple risk chain model of biorisk, from actor intent to a biological event, where the actor can successfully pass through each of

Indexed as

FearGovernmentSecurity MeasuresHumansTerrorismBiological eventBiotechnologyPublic health preparedness/responseRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID32522112
PMCPMC7310205
OpenAlexW3032933118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.