ArticleGenes2020
Rapid Evaluation of CRISPR Guides and Donors for Engineering Mice.
Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A protocol for karyotyping and genetic editing of induced pluripotent stem cells with homology-directed repair mediated CRISPR/Cas9.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- An ERK5-NRF2 Axis Mediates Senescence-Associated Stemness and Atherosclerosis.Circulation research · 2023Article
- Review
- Designing and generating a mouse model: frequently asked questions.Journal of biomedical research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/ CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9) technique has dramatically lowered the cost and increased the speed of generating genetically engineered mice, success depends on using guide RNAs and donor DNAs which direct efficient knock-out (KO) or knock-in (KI). By Sanger sequencing DNA from blastocysts previously injected with the same CRISPR components intended to produce the engineered mice, one can test the effectiveness of different guide RNAs and donor DNAs. We describe in detail here a simple, rapid (three days), inexpensive protocol, for amplifying DNA from blastocysts to determine the results of CRISPR point mutation KIs. Using it, we show that (1) the rate of KI seen in blastocysts is similar to that seen in mice for a given guide RNA/donor DNA pair, (2) a donor complementary to the variable portion of a guide integrated in a more all-or-none fashion, (3) donor DNAs can be used simultaneously to integrate two different mutations into the same locus, and (4) by placing silent mutations about every 6 to 10 bp between the Cas9 cut site and the desired mutation(s), the desired mutation(s) can be incorporated into genomic DNA over 30 bp away from the cut at the same high efficiency as close to the cut.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.