Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32520976›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Differences in the molecular profile of endometrial cancers from British White and British South Asian women.

Konstantinos Polymeros, David S Guttery, Roger Hew, Rachael Bishop, Elizabeth Stannard, Salvador Macip, Paul Symonds, Esther L Moss

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Konstantinos PolymerosLeicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6589-0663
David S GutteryLeicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0418-580X
Roger HewDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, England, United Kingdom.
Rachael BishopDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, England, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth StannardDepartment of Pathology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, England, United Kingdom.
Salvador MacipDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1963-8840
Paul SymondsLeicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, England, United Kingdom.
Esther L MossLeicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, England, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK C1362/A18081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify differences in the mutational profile of endometrial tumours between British White (BW) and South Asian (BSA) women.

methodsWe analysed primary tumours from matched cohorts of British White (BW) and British South Asian (BSA) women resident in Leicestershire diagnosed with EC. Next Generation Sequencing was performed to investigate mutational differences in a panel of 10 genes previously identified as being commonly mutated in EC. The presence of somatic Mismatch Repair (MMR) gene deficiencies was determined by immunohistochemistry.

resultsIn total, 57 tumours (27 BSA and 30 BW) were sequenced. There was no significant difference in the overall mutation frequency of the 10 genes analysed; however, numerous differences were observed between the groups. There was a positive association between PIK3CA and PTEN mutations in the BSA group, with 78% of PIK3CA-mutant tumours harbouring a PTEN mutation, whereas only 11% of PIK3CA wild-type (wt) tumours were PTEN mutant positive (p = 0.0012). In BW women, 90% of ARID1A mutant tumours had co-existent PI3K pathway mutations versus 50% of wild-type (wt) ARID1A patients (p = 0.0485). This trend was not significant in the BSA group (p = 0.66). The age at diagnosis was significantly higher in the BW group with a somatic MMR gene deficiency compared to those with no deficiency (72.8 years versus 59.6 years, p = 0.007), whereas this difference was not seen in the BSA group (64 years versus 60 years, p = 0.37).

conclusionWe have identified differences in the mutational profile of primary EC tumours from BW and BSA women. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and to explore their potential implications for early detection, treatment response and prognosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsian PeopleCarcinoma, EndometrioidCohort StudiesDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA, NeoplasmDNA Repair EnzymesEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiddle AgedMutationUnited KingdomDNA, NeoplasmDNA Repair Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID32520976
PMCPMC7286498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.