Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32520944›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Movement of St. Louis encephalitis virus in the Western United States, 2014- 2018.

Daniele M Swetnam, Jackson B Stuart, Katherine Young, Payal D Maharaj, Ying Fang, Sandra Garcia, Christopher M Barker, Kirk Smith, Marvin S Godsey, Harry M Savage and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cross-Protection between West Nile Virus and Emerging Flaviviruses in Wild Birds.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Daniele M SwetnamDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6694-5571
Jackson B StuartDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Katherine YoungDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Payal D MaharajDivision of Vector-borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4157-4479
Ying FangDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Sandra GarciaDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Christopher M BarkerDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Kirk SmithMaricopa County Environmental Services Department, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
Marvin S GodseyDivision of Vector-borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4526-6262
Harry M SavageDivision of Vector-borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Vonnita BartonIdaho Bureau of Laboratories, Boise, Idaho, United States of America.
Bethany G BollingLaboratory Services Section, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Nisha DuggalDepartment of Molecular Biology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Aaron C BraultDivision of Vector-borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Lark L CoffeyDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0718-5146
University of California, Davis · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USMaricopa County Department of Public Health · USTexas Department of State Health Services · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

ACL HHS U01CK000516NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) is a flavivirus that circulates in an enzootic cycle between birds and mosquitoes and can also infect humans to cause febrile disease and sometimes encephalitis. Although SLEV is endemic to the United States, no activity was detected in California during the years 2004 through 2014, despite continuous surveillance in mosquitoes and sentinel chickens. In 2015, SLEV-positive mosquito pools were detected in Maricopa County, Arizona, concurrent with an outbreak of human SLEV disease. SLEV-positive mosquito pools were also detected in southeastern California and Nevada in summer 2015. From 2016 to 2018, SLEV was detected in mosquito pools throughout southern and central California, Oregon, Idaho, and Texas. To understand genetic relatedness and geographic dispersal of SLEV in the western United States since 2015, we sequenced four historical genomes (3 from California and 1 from Louisiana) and 26 contemporary SLEV genomes from mosquito pools from locations across the western US. Bayesian phylogeographic approaches were then applied to map the recent spread of SLEV. Three routes of SLEV dispersal in the western United States were identified: Arizona to southern California, Arizona to Central California, and Arizona to all locations east of the Sierra Nevada mountains. Given the topography of the Western United States, these routes may have been limited by mountain ranges that influence the movement of avian reservoirs and mosquito vectors, which probably represents the primary mechanism of SLEV dispersal. Our analysis detected repeated SLEV introductions from Arizona into southern California and limited evidence of year-to-year persistence of genomes of the same ancestry. By contrast, genetic tracing suggests that all SLEV activity since 2015 in central California is the result of a single persistent SLEV introduction. The identification of natural barriers that influence SLEV dispersal enhances our understanding of arbovirus ecology in the western United States and may also support regional public health agencies in implementing more targeted vector mitigation efforts to protect their communities more effectively.

Indexed as

AnimalsBayes TheoremCulicidaeDisease OutbreaksEncephalitis, St. LouisEncephalitis Virus, St. LouisGenome, ViralHumansMosquito VectorsPhylogenyPhylogeographyUnited StatesWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32520944
PMCPMC7307790
OpenAlexW3034081652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.