Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32520922›Full record

SynthesisMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2020

Evaluation of endovenous sedation using BIS monitoring in dentistry. A systematic review.

S Pérez-García, N Lozano-Carrascal, J-A Ruiz-Roca, P López-Jornet, J Gargallo-Albiol

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Correlation of occlusion pressure with sedation in non-neurocritical patients].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S Pérez-GarcíaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery C/ Josep Trueta s/n, St. Cugat del Vallés Barcelona, Spain sperezga@uic.es.
N Lozano-CarrascalSurgery Department. International University of Catalonia Josep trueta s/n, Sant Cugat del Valles, Barcelona, Spain oscarsalomo@uic.es.
J-A Ruiz-Roca
P López-Jornet
J Gargallo-Albiol
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya · ESUniversidad de Murcia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the present review was evaluate the utility and validity of the Bispectral Index (BIS) in dental treatment carried out under endovenous sedation, and compare its efficacy with clinical sedation scales. MATERIAL AND

methodsElectronic and manual literature searches were conducted by two independent reviewers for articles published up to April 2017 in several databases, including Medline and Cochrane Library.

resultsSixteen articles met the inclusion criteria. A correlation was identified between BIS and clinical sedation scales. A BIS range between 75 and 84 showed a high probability of corresponding to an Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation Scale (OAA/S) value of 3; a scored 3 on the Ramsay scale corresponds around 85 on the BIS; while BIS values between 57 and 64 corresponded to a University of Michigan Sedation Scale value of 3. BIS monitoring provides continuous measurement of the patient's hypnotic state or state of consciousness, awareness, and recall. It proved impossible to perform an analysis of statistical data drawn from the studies reviewed due to the disparity of inclusion criteria among the works.

conclusionsBIS for sedation monitoring might make possible to evaluate sedation levels objectively in real time, reducing the dose of the sedative required, increasing safety, and minimizing secondary effects.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyHypnotics and SedativesDentistryHumansProcedural SedationHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID32520922
PMCPMC7338067
OpenAlexW3033981127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.