Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32520747›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychiatry2020

Digital technology for management of severe mental disorders in low-income and middle-income countries.

Rutvij Merchant, John Torous, Elena Rodriguez-Villa, John A Naslund

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. COVID-19 Mobile Apps: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rutvij MerchantHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
John TorousThe Division of Digital Psychiatry at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Elena Rodriguez-VillaThe Division of Digital Psychiatry at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
John A NaslundDepartment of Global Health & Social Medicine, Harvard Medicl School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hadassah Medical Center · ILHarvard University · US

Funding

ESSENCE (Enabling translation of Science to Service to ENhance Depression CarE) Scale-UpU19MH113211 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NASLUND, JOHN A, PATEL, VIKRAM H · 2017 to 2023
$3.7M
Digital Phenotyping for Computational Models of Relapse Prediction in Early Course PsychosisK23MH116130 · NIMH · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOROUS, JOHN · 2018 to 2021
$872k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH116130NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH113211Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIncreasingly, digital technologies, especially mobile telecommunications and smartphone apps, are seen as a novel tool for managing severe mental disorders (SMDs) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, there is a need to identify best practices in the use of digital technologies to effectively reach, support, and manage care for patients living with SMDs. In this review, we summarize recent studies using digital technology to manage symptoms and support clinical care for this patient population and discuss new opportunities to advance digital psychiatry research and practice in LMICs. RECENT

findingsStudies evaluating digital interventions for clinical populations living with SMDs in LMICs are limited. Yet, across recent articles surveyed, digital technology appears to yield diverse benefits for this at-risk patient population. These benefits include improved medication adherence, appointment adherence, reduced instances of relapse, and fewer re-hospitalizations. SUMMARY: Continued rigorous research evaluating effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of digital technologies in reaching, treating, and managing symptoms and supporting clinical care for patients with SMDs in LMICs is vital. The urgency for remote approaches for delivering specialized psychiatric care is particularly pronounced because of the immediate and long-term impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on access to in-person services. Future research should emphasize participatory approaches rooted in a process of codesign with target users, in order to achieve clinically effective remotely delivered digital mental health interventions.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsMental DisordersPandemicsPneumonia, ViralTelemedicineBetacoronavirusCOVID-19Developing CountriesHumansInternet-Based InterventionSARS-CoV-2Socioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID32520747
PMCPMC7398830
OpenAlexW3033971361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.